Harrison Bergeron

https://www.fox4news.com/news/dallas-museum-of-art-break-in-art-damaged DALLAS - A 21-year-old man who police said broke into the Dallas Museum of Art, destroying $5 million worth of ancient artifacts, reportedly said he did it because he was "mad at his girl." This happened just before 10 p.m. Wednesday, when a spokeswoman for the museum said someone "forcibly entered" the museum.

https://www.fox4news.com CENTERVILLE, Texas - It's been three weeks since Gonzalo Lopez, 46, escaped from custody and the manhunt continues to find him, especially after bodies were found in a home near where he escaped. - two adults, three kids found dead - dude stabbed bus driver during transport

She definitely shouldn't have welched on the pledge.

Another reason why twatter in particular is such a cesspool of stupidity. I didn't watch this trial and am consistently opposed to nationalizing local / private events. As @wildcat09 noted, sometimes juries make mistakes, but that does not mean the system needs to be burned down or there is some great conspiratorial evil at play. This weird trend has emerged where the tiny but loud crazies believe the system must perfectly match their will in ever case or be destroyed and to deny its destruction is to play into some X. Verdict goes my way, the system is amazing. It doesn't, it's literally Hitler. No opinion really on this case - not a lawyer, only heard about it through similar inescapable channels - think he's right: Depp came across as more believable and authentic and probably more likable in this particular instance despite being arguable the weirdest dude in Hollywood. Given my little exposure, she did seem to come across as a nutjob in this particular case and particularly disingenuous. I think she probably lost the case on the entire donating the $7M to charity lie ... I can imagine the average joe jury looking at this privileged actress feigning charity probably did not land too well and made her out to be completely non-credible. It is one of those lies made worse by the fact it was unnecessary, purely fake virtue signaling. But harkening back to a college paper on Falwell v. Hustler, I am digging the actual malice discussion among the barristers. My guess is the original interview and source of the complaints probably was a mix of 15% vendetta against Depp and 85% trying to get credibility as a battered woman, #metoo victim ... doesn't mean it's right she got to use him as the foil. In the context of the fake charity donations seems like another unsubstantiated virtual signal.

Just finished up and agree with everyone's thoughts. Particularly: The cast worked really well collectively in Seasons 1-3, but it really loses something when they're in three groups Toward that, agree the Hopper and California plot lines are pointless as is Will ... Mike and Jonathan only valuable to watch them get dumped (I almost bailed if there was one more scene with Argyle) I can buy into the fantasy stuff, but the fast and loose with reality is eye rolling - the entire Hopper arc is just silly on myriad levels from his resistance to frostbite from ability to fight the demagordon after being in a Siberian prison for a year ... Lucas in general ... Nancy's ability to charm anything with a pecker ... Kill Lucas and keep his sister - older Lucas sucks ... Dustin is the only kid that adds something pretty funny - keep him and the olds and have Mike and Will run off to Vegas and get married by Elvis or go Brokeback on the Yellowstone Orderly / 01 / Creel kid / Vecna too obvious ... should have been more subtle and saved the "01" tattoo for the final scene - seemed stupidly redundant ... and the back story way over-explained ...

Not sure she ever recovers from Amber Turd. Every movie - unless she's nekkid - the only thing people will see is her taking a shit in the bed ... in her own bed ... on purpose.

This may get him off the Kevin Spacey list so he should win big long-term.

I think the jury rules in his favor but may give him $1. (but I'll acknowledge I have only gotten second-hand takes) As far as I can tell he's probably already won in the court of public opinion. Doesn't not exactly come across well, but Turd looks crazy enough and dishonest enough to not fully buy what she's selling.

I get trademark owners wanting to control their brands, but I've never fully grasped things like this or the strange prohibition against using "Olympics" or "Super Bowl." I think a bunch of these "off label" Elvis stuff only kept him top-of-mind and ultimately strengthened the brand. Impersonators, wedding chapels, and velvets have kept Elvis in the popular culture much more than his music.

Mr. Skeletor gets a mug shot: https://www.yahoo.com/news/nancy-pelosis-husband-paul-pelosi-215047681.html WASHINGTON - Paul Pelosi, the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was arrested Saturday in Napa, California, for allegedly driving under the influence, according to county records. A booking report shows Paul Pelosi, 82, was arrested at 11:44 p.m. PT Saturday, booked at 4 a.m. Sunday and charged with misdemeanors for allegedly driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08% or higher. Bail was set at $5,000.