Jump to content

TXpride

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

972 Surly 10%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. There is a general lack of discipline, focus, and attention to detail that has existed for Sark's entire tenure. It was blatantly apparent against UGA. I don't think an OC fixes that. It's a reflection of Sark's personality.
  2. This isn't unique to Texas. No AD at any blue blood or near-blue blood program does.
  3. I'm guessing he's referring to the playoff.
  4. We're talking about resources not talent. Recruiting rankings (imperfect as they may be) and roster pricetag are really the only measures we have of "resources." And our resources indicate that we should be able to compete (and occasionally win) at the highest level. You want to say OSU and UGA have more talent, fine. I actually agree. But it's not because of superior resources. We've had a top 5 recruiting class 5 years in a row, including the #1 class in 2025. We went into Georgia and poached their state's top recruit 2 years in a row. We reportedly have the most expensive roster in the country. The fact that we aren't as talented as OSU/UGA is an indictment on our roster construction, evaluation, and development. All of that begins and ends with Sark.
  5. I wouldn't say we're equally matched. Our OL is hot garbage. But we do have equal, if not better resources, so the product is inexcusable either way.
  6. Sark needs 10 years because that's how long Kirby has been at UGA. It makes perfect sense when you think about it.
  7. 21-10 lead in the 4Q. We hadn't driven the length of the field all game. That onside kick was basically just Kirby telling Sark "I own you bitch."
  8. I think Cignetti fits the mold as well. A disciplined dickhead. I thought it could be Herman when we hired him, but he only had the dickhead part.
  9. Are all those players still on the roster? I get it takes time to build a program, but not a fucking decade. Sark did it in 3 years, and now he's clearly regressed.
  10. Is your point that we don't have the resources to compete at the highest level? Because recruiting rankings (not everything, but the best barometer we have) and roster pricetag say we should be in the same zip code as OSU and UGA. Their hand me downs being starters for us points to a systemic evaluation/development problem, not a recruiting/resource problem.
  11. There's not some massive gap between us and OSU/UGA in recruiting. We're consistently top 5 and had the #1 class last year. We also (allegedly) have the most expensive roster in the country. Point being, we have the resources to win at least some of these games. If you want to argue that our talent level isn't actually what the recruiting rankings say it is, then we have a problem with evaluation and development. Either way Sark is falling short.
  12. When you own someone like he owns Sark, you can say whatever the fuck you want.
  13. Have you been paying attention the last month?
  14. The cigars will decide that. If he goes 8-4 or worse next year (pretty likely with our schedule), he'll be gone if the money is there.
  15. I'm past that. He's not the guy. But he'll be here at least through next year. Hopefully there'll be some good candidates.
×
×
  • Create New...