Jump to content

TXpride

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    499
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

667 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Neither of those teams are close to NC caliber. This was the easiest path they'll ever have.
  2. James Franklin just lost to the first legit team he faced in the playoffs? I'm stunned.
  3. "Blue blood" is a subjective term fucktard, not a fact of history. It's based entirely on perception at a given time. We won our first title in 1963. Nebraska won their first in 1970. Minnesota had 7. To think your 2025 opinion will mean jack shit in 2075, when hardly anyone alive remembers Nebraska wining a title, is laughable hubris.
  4. Hey dipshit, you said "Teams dont become blue bloods and teams don’t lose the designation. The eight blue bloods are now and forever." You think your dumbass opinion of blue blood "designation" in 2025 will mean jack shit 50 years from now? 100 years from now?
  5. I'm sure Minnesota fans thought the same thing in the 1940s.
  6. I don't know that it would've been irrecoverable (hence "I honestly don't know..."), but I think there's a chance it could've been. All the positive momentum around the program would've done a 180.
  7. Choking the ASU game away would've been an absolute disaster. I honestly don't know if Sark would've been able to recover from it.
  8. If Nebraska is still a "blue blood" the term is meaningless.
  9. The significance of 4th and 13 wasn't so much that we advanced.. it's that we avoided one of the biggest choke jobs in CFB history.
  10. This year's national champion will not be a conference champion, and will have either 2 losses or a loss to Northern Illinios. This is the new reality with an expanded playoff.
×
×
  • Create New...