Jump to content

Randolph Duke

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3097
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Randolph Duke

  1. I didn't say I was going to be gone. I said I've given up on this incarnation of UT football. It's a horrible product and the people responsible (Eltife) need to be kept in mind. Eltife wanted to be the big man (see what I did there?) and run the show. He's in over his head. Sark is not the man to run the program, the next two years are going to be purgatory for UT football fans, and I'm going to sit this debacle out.
  2. Sportico just released a new database of collegiate financials. They are using DOE numbers that haven't been updated since the pandemic, but I am sure the DOE will get their shit together and start actually doing their jobs again soon. The database is somewhat interactive. Here is the comp between aggy and Texas. If you go to the database you can get much more info. https://www.sportico.com/business/commerce/2021/college-sports-finances-database-intercollegiate-1234646029/
  3. No. Kevin Eltife is the architect of this team, from the firing of Tom Herman on down. Sorry, but I’m not about to (yet again) to live passes to idiots who insist on making all the decisions because the donate the most. The big UT donors are complete idiots.
  4. Did it escape you we lost try again? Back in my day, we weren’t the team that lived and died on moral victories.
  5. Oh, no. Kevin Eltife and the other incompetents who have driven this program into the ground don’t get to be let off the hook. I have every intention of driving Eltife’s midget ass into the dirt that it deserves. Mid you want to get did of me, you’re going to first hold responsible the person who put this team together.
  6. It’s called” a noisy recusal.” To hell if I will give a pass to fucking incompetent pieces of shit who cash their checks and deliver nothing.
  7. Do you’re saying “wait till next spring?” Fuck Chris Del Conte. He has delivered a long-term loser to UT football. Abandon ship. Abandon UT athletics. Just move on.
  8. Fuck you, and Kevin Eltife. The fact that you are ok with UT Steve Sarkisian not being qualified to sniff the jock of the OU coach tells me a lot. Texas football has devolved to a joke. No one questions whether they can compete against any UT football team. Fuck UT athletics.
  9. Sorry, Sark, but fuck you. I officially abandon UT athletics. I’m not sure anyone associated with UT athletes has a clue how to do their job. They just raise prices every year and call themselves “marketers.” 2005-2021= much humiliation. The players now get paid huge money and not a one of them could pray to be qualified for the big money position of sniffing Lincoln Riley’s jock. Sorry, UT athletics, Its not just that you can’t deliver anything but loses, it’s just that you are losers.
  10. It's time I abandon UT football. We have tried for years with every advantage possible and we can't find a coach even remotely capable of even sniffing Lincoln Riley's jock.
  11. No. Sark is a loser and should feel bad. Sark sucks.
  12. Fuck Sark. Im tired of being asked to support coaches who can’t dream of a day they they are qualified to sniff Lincoln Riley’s jock. Texas sucks.
  13. Just let it go. Steve Sarkisian isn’t qualified to sniff Lincoln Riley’s jock. UT football has been transformed into a culture of losers. Either learn to live as a loser, or just walk away. For me, I’m walking away.
  14. Steve Sarkesian isn’t qualified to sniff Lincoln Riley’s jock.
  15. It's been two years and not a single aggy has won a dime in my $1,000,000 "aggy yell leader" sweepstakes.
  16. Let the fucking conference burn in Hell.
  17. Just talked with a neighbor who is a nurse. Evidently there is a company in Dallas that has nurses doing at-home IV therapy for medical patients. A “marathon group” had the nurses come out this morning for medical hydration. It was fans getting pregame IVs do they could start drinking again.
  18. Nope. I never post under any other name. If I have something to say, you won’t have to wonder if it’s me. The online troll Code of Honor is sacrosanct in my profession.
  19. The true timeline of aggy "military excellence" is : The school was founded to teach young, white boys between the ages of 13 and 22 farming techniques that were being developed as the nation industrialized. Because farm boys in this age range were thought to have problems meeting the expectations of personal decorum, the "corps of cadets" was established to have a restrictive framework of discipline in place. Not until 1904 did the War Department believe any "military tactics" taught at A&M were of any value. It was at this time the school quit takings kids as young as 13, and moved the minimum age to no younger than 18 (unless approved otherwise). In 1916, Congress established ROTC. A&M updated their curriculum to align with the ROTC structure. 1934 - in Hamilton v Regents, the Supreme Court established Land Grant schools had no obligation to teach military tactics and that the U.S.military had no connections or association with fake military claims such as A&M had been trying to promote since its inception. 1941-1945 They put down their play swords and costumes, entered legitimate military service, and won WWII all by themselves.
×
×
  • Create New...