Jump to content

GoneFission

New Members
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

23 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This is fair on all accounts. If others think that this is too much to speculation I'm happy to delete it.
  2. Its weird that L'Oreal posts on Instagram all the time but never posts photos of the kid. And no public photos exist of the kid outside of some odd black and white photos that don't show the face. Also to be clear I didn't start the rumor. There were rumors of her and Worthy a while ago and now her and Golden. But given none pf us were Case McCoy in this scenario and it would be difficult to get a DNA test all we can do. Also odd that they announced the divorce in July then 8 months later had a baby. If the divorce was announced then they were likely privately separated prior to that.
  3. The baby was late March early April and a strong possibility that it is not his.
  4. Curious where this rumor came from as I keep seeing it referenced There were some rumors between her and Worthy a while ago. Now it is her and Golden. From the outside the only observable data is they announced a divorce then 8 months later had a baby. Said baby is 6 months old and despite L'Oreal always posting on Instagram and loving attention she has yet to post a normal baby photo implying the baby isn't Sarks.
  5. Putting on my internet detective hat (I keep it right next to my tin foil hat for those interested) L'Oreal likes attention and has a pretty big Instagram presence. However, despite having a baby, which as we all know is one of the most coveted Instagram accessories due to their cuteness and love by all, L'Oreal has only posted odd black and white photos and nothing showing the baby's face. Sark is Armenian and has some pretty strong features that would be kind of dominant and show up on a baby boy after a few months. As stated here earlier Sark/L'Oreal announced their divorce in 2024 and about 8 months later had said baby. Odd timing. Of anyone needs me putting the tin foil hat back on.
  6. If I got beat up by this guy cowboy (not that there is anything wrong with that) I would be too embarrassed to report it
  7. Yeah SLS data seems likely Monday morning. Will be interesting to see. No position but a vaccine to help cancer patients would be the first of its kind (though others have tried).
  8. Adding more PALI here sub $1.80. Got caught up looking at another ticker yesterday so didn't put a description but this one has a similar MOA to ABVX which took off in July. Could even be more effective for things like Crohns. Still very early but some smart people in biotech that I pay attention to think it could be close to $3 by EOY and $4 prior to the next readout. Recent low price action has been low as they did a private placement and the buyer is doing a quick dump to the market. Downside is that some of the data propping up the price is from China which had trouble replicating elsewhere. They have their own non China data which has been good though. Price action is volatile with the low market cap. TLDR joining the PALI-ban
  9. GUTS up to $1.56. Still looking good after buying in on 9/26 for $1.18. PALI looks good also. Bought last Wednesday, Friday, and this morning for between $1.50 and $1.72 for an average of $1.63 and it's up to $2.25 now. Still holding.
  10. ABVX 84.91 ATYR 0.72 For October going long NKTR at 56.90. Still like ABVX but price action seems like a longer time frame. No shorts.
  11. I can see the background with a Nickelodeon Guts theme now and the agrro crag
  12. GUTS looks promising but still early. Under 200 million market cap still. It is a procedure for people who finish a GLP 1 dosage who don't want to keep up taking GLP 1s forever. Biggest problem with GLP 1s is that people put the weight on after they stop taking them. The procedure stops that in a significant way compared to participants who had a sham procedure. Only 45 patients in the study and it was only 30 days but good data so far. Follow up data in the next few months but could be commercialized in the next year. I got in earlier for about $1.2.
  13. Didn't include these details in my original post but the check was deposited in a bank that only has branches several hundred miles away from the place we sent it from and the vendors address. So it somewhat had to be the post office. But I (wrongly, I suppose) had a lot more confidence in the post office that this sort of low level fraud wouldn't occur.
  14. We've had check fraud for mailed checks as well. We would mail checks for a few thousand to a few vendors who won't take online payments and had the checks end up cashed to a completely different name but the same amount. We couldn't figure out how they were getting to the checks but this would make sense. Heard about other businesses having a similar issue as well.
×
×
  • Create New...