Aggy sucks, no contest there, but....if those two were on our team, they would be the second best WR duo behind Smith and Tate, imo; they just unfortunately have Reed as a QB, but they've made him look so, so much better than he is. Once we took away the pass game, Reed was inert, Owens sucks, but EJ Smith is weirdly much better than Owens. Owens has always sucked, and it showed with his 3.owens ypc. Smith averaged 6.8 ypc. Had they actually used him properly, who knows how much better he could have gotten. He's the only reason they have 17 instead of 10 points. His moves are what I wish Baxter could do. Is that a product of our DL? Possibly. But the probability is low since we held Owens and Reed in check.
I dunno. There's something different about Emmitt's kid. I bet he plays in the NFL for at least 6 years, which would be 4 more than Owens. Anyway, their WR's are good, I'm not gonna go full hate-tard just because they're aggys. Had they had Arch throwing to them (late year Arch) they would have been destroying teams. Wingo is fine, he's just an athlete playing WR, and I like Mosley. Moore seems to have regressed. But we do have McCutcheon who will be so much better.
My point being is, as much as I hate the Harvard on the Brazos tards, their WR corps is miles better than ours, loss or not.