Jump to content

Codaxx

Full Members
  • Posts

    4537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Codaxx

  1. 2021 top 15- Ewers, Williams, Huard, Maye, Vandagriff, McCarthy, Salter, McCord, Buchner, Morton, Stowers, Dart, Milroe, Moss.. Williams and Maye are only ones that are definitely above Quinn. 2022 top 15- Allar, Klubnick, Weigman, Simpson, Brown, Howard, Stockton, Evers, Maalik Murphy, Brady Allen, Houser, Jackson, Duffy, Geriner, and Horn. so is you look at his original class only Fiftia is question mark. You cant pretend that Allar or Klubnick have even been close to Quinn.
  2. That has always been my thinking. Texas could still get screwed, but that is best possible resume for Texas. The best possible thing for Texas is multiple undefeated teams lose next weekend
  3. Either way you cut it, Oregon is a huge outlier among the 1 loss teams I am not sure Sagarin is up to date. Michigan looks a low after OSU and PSU in back to back weeks
  4. https://www.espn.com/college-football/fpi/_/view/resume I just used that, since ESPN seems to be at the center of anything college football
  5. It’s true, but encouraging poor scheduling is terrible for College football fans and the game. Here is SOS currently undefeated teams: 1. Michigan (sos 36) 2. Washington ( 46) 3. FSU (56) 4. Georgia (59) 1 loss: 5. OSU (6) 6. Texas (13) 7. Bama (31) 8. Oregon (61) Committee may completely reverse the SOS rankings of 1 loss teams, which is pretty crazy.
  6. The committee could make a completely ridiculous ruling. I can’t stop that. There is 1 known in all of this, Texas won’t jump an undefeated team. That would lead most logical people to root against all the undefeated teams. If it comes to a beauty pageant beating the SEC champ would be helpful.
  7. I want to see FSU lose #1 and Bama win #2. Texas will need Bama to win to boost its resume.
  8. Maybe it was Sark publicly bitching. Hard to explain, it’s not like Texas hasn’t played shitty QBs and mediocre WRs before. Texas even played some inside leverage
  9. Because both have much better SOS. That is part of the criteria. Based on their criteria it should probably look like this: OSU, Texas, Bama, and then Oregon.. People would freak out about OSU being the top 1 loss team, but if the others won a championship they would jump OSU the next week based on the criteria.
  10. I'm concerned they aren't going to make a correction because they can't find a good reason to change it (short of admitting they screwed up). This is exactly the problem. People view rankings like they are static. There might have been a legit argument to say the Utah win was comparable to the Bama win 1 month ago. This pervasive idea that you can’t change rankings without admitting fault is absurd. It may play out this year, but I am pointing out this view is what is wrong with human rankings
  11. There is also SOS, which highly favors both Texas and Bama over Oregon. Not to mention you are saying margin of victory doesn’t matter, but it’s literally the basis for Oregon being ahead of Texas and Bama. They are getting a bump for blowing out shitty PAC teams
  12. Why would double digit win a on the road vs a top 8 team matter? Why the fuck would it not? Texas is the only team to win in Bama by double digits since Saban arrived. I am pointing out that information changes throughout the year. Your point of view is the inherent flaw in rankings. One of the reasons the PAC gets respect this year is due to early wins over TCU and Florida. Neither of those teams are going bowling this year, so those wins should mean little now. Unfortunately, people are stubborn. They have a hard time adjusting their opinions, when information changes. Perhaps hubris will stop the Committee from following their written guidelines, but we shall see.
  13. That is the problem with the early rankings. The committee tried to say the Utah win was the same as the Bama win. That looks completely stupid now. Let’s not pretend that we haven’t seen teams leap frogged in the final rankings.. all I know is the committee has written guidelines. Those are Championships, SOS, head to Head, and comparative outcomes of common opponents. Those are written on their website, those are not my criteria. Based on their website, there isn’t a single criteria that puts Oregon over Texas
  14. When circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must be considered: Championships won Strength of schedule Head‐to‐head competition (if it occurred) Comparative outcomes of common opponents (without incenting margin of victory) https://collegefootballplayoff.com/sports/2016/10/24/selection-committee-protocol that is the committee guidelines on their site.. that should favor Texas
  15. That was one of Quinn’s worst games of the season. He was very hesitant after the quick start
  16. Arch showed some talent 1. He runs like Cooper. Good athlete 2. That release is Marino like. He gets the ball out fast.. 3. His pocket presence may be the best in the QB room 4. His decision making was quick This was all in garbage time vs a beaten down defense, so there is a lot of extrapolation going on. It’s completely irrational, but I want to see more
  17. Price was a big loss for Tech (and the DT). Just looking at the bigger picture. The DL dominated. PK took the opportunity to be more aggressive on the secondary. That hasn’t always been the case, so I am going to take it as a win
  18. Codaxx

    Texas RB Talk

    Inside zone is a staple of his offense. I don’t think that is going to change.
  19. Codaxx

    Texas RB Talk

    This is just wrong. If speed was the prerequisite for being an offensive fit, we would have watched KRob as the starter the last 2 years
  20. Lot more bump and run from the field side tonight (watts usually presses). It was nice. This was far and away the best the secondary looked this season. That was with Muhammad out there (who had a hell of a game).
  21. Normally I would mock the SEC chant, but it was in response to Yormark being put on the screen. I approve and applaud 100k people being wise asses
  22. Nice to see all the press coverage this game. Even the field side is pressing
  23. I could be wrong, but I dont have a lot of faith in these early mocks. I think Caleb Williams and Drake May are the 2 stand outs. The next group is pretty malleable. I would bet the rankign in that group changes several times before the draft.
×
×
  • Create New...