Make em eat Taco Bell

"Israel is a nation of murderers" - Norman Finkelstein (Jewish) how do 2 boys get grenades anyway? No doubt they were rocks, or just 1 rock, but the IDF treats Arabs like vermin (to the delight of Surly right wingers) and gets away with murder all day all night, then the Jewish nation claims victimhood. Then the Jewish nation claims its all antisemitism, then claims it does not control the US goverment. As RV (poster) said, it's an "idiot world".

and then have the government pass a profoundly pro Zionist bill with little opposition.

it's instructional. It's ok, your rock my man.

that's not what i meant

it's an invitation

whenever white supremacy is urgently needed on campus, frat boys are readily available. For Free!

of all the hundreds arrested nationwide, any Zionists in that trap?

Houston is favored with a SP 10.87 ERA. Cle is +110. Has any team had so many pitchers close to 10.00 at this point of the season? I'm counting anyone DFA as well.

Biden does not have 1, 10, 11, 12, 13. That's 5 and one more means he's done according to Lichtman. Biden isn't winning Michigan, unless the Arabs come to their senses and vote for him.

still very early , but keep an eye on him. Media says he's 9-1 , but 2000 was robbed, so he's 10-0. He has been called the Nostradamus of US presidential elections. Allan Lichtman has correctly predicted the result of nine of the past 10 (and even the one that got away, in 2000, he insists was stolen from Al Gore). But now he is gearing up for perhaps his greatest challenge: Joe Biden v Donald Trump II https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/26/allan-lichtman-prediction-presidential-election#:~:text=He has been called,Biden v Donald Trump II. ‘A lot would have to go wrong for Biden to lose’: can Allan Lichtman predict the 2024 election? They came up with 13 true/false questions and a decision rule: if six or more keys went against the White House party, it would lose. If fewer than six went against it, it would win. These are the 13 keys, as summarised by AU’s website: 1. Party mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the US House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections. 2. Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination. 3. Incumbency: The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president. 4. Third party: There is no significant third party or independent campaign. 5. Short-term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign. 6. Long-term economy: Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms. 7. Policy change: The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy. 8. Social unrest: There is no sustained social unrest during the term. 9. Scandal: The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal. 10. Foreign/military failure: The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs. 11. Foreign/military success: The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs. 12. Incumbent charisma: The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero. 13. Challenger charisma: The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

the timing implies the effort to stifle campus protests, since the bill targets Dept of Education funding to schools. Meaning if you let the Pals on campus, your money is cut off.

it's censorship, taken from the IHRA definition almost word for word. International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, a Zionist propaganda group. I'm surprised this took so long as the IHRA has been around for years and the definition embraced by many institutions. https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to: Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis. Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries). Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews. Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.

you are Jewish, then tell us what defines a Jew. It's important in defining the conflict because many believe it's about Judaism (religion) vs. Islam.

the question was answered with no answer and then a diversion to something else (because you have no answer and never will). Google is your friend, just copy and paste something.

Doesn't answer the question of what defines being a Jew (also silly obsession with the Holocaust)