I just don't see the difference - or a distinction without a difference. Whether your roadie is a bumblefuck and can't be careful or you treat your instrument like a precious artifact (which I do), those nicks and bruises are little different than a factory fresh finish - it's arbitrary. For art, it's the end that matters and less-so the journey (you guitar falling off its stand isn't much of a story, or it's a story that holds as much value as that ding getting there by some craftsman skilled at making dings). And you could play 80 years and no amount of "honest work" is going to wear a modern finish. The only thing that holds true is what the guitar looks like, and in the case of a pre-worn neck, how it plays. "Honest work" doesn't contribute a thing where art is concerned. The only "relic'd" guitars that have value for their relic beyond appearance are guitars owned or played by famous or important musicians at famous or important gigs. Joe Blow's 40 years of "honest work" adds little to no value where art is concerned. And where art is concerned, pristine and relic'd are the exact same thing.
But, on the other hand, Rat Rods do nothing for me. I'm complicated.