Jump to content

Gatorubet

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    16096
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Gatorubet last won the day on October 1

Gatorubet had the most liked content!

Reputation

40204 Surly 1%

1 Follower

About Gatorubet

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yeah, The Turtle absolutely meant to make that comparison. But here’s another thing: saying that Trump is acting like Biden is not meant for you or me, but as a comment meant to hurt Trump‘s relationship with the MAGA base. Maybe….
  2. Looks like lows in 30s, highs low 50s this week. Still, we all know how much fun it is not to have electricity, no matter what the temperature. Food over 40° spoils. Frozen food thaws. You have no lights, you can’t do laundry, you can’t have your operation or medical treatment, your kids can’t go to school. Work is closed, and if you don’t go to work, you don’t get paid. The gas pumps don’t work, assuming they have gas to sell. Nothing makes an unhappy person angrier than someone telling them. Everything is fine. Putin likes to tell them everything‘s fine. He should do more of that. if anyone has found some site that tracks energy outages in Russia, that would let us know how many people are involved in how long the outage has been, that would be interesting. Moscow looks about 10-15 degrees colder than that.
  3. I agree. It’s why they say you don’t wanna watch legislation or sausage being made. I’ve never practiced criminal law and know nothing about it. I am unclear about that whole three count indictment being followed by the two count indictment. If the original indictment contained three counts, with the the grand jury not finding count one, but blessing count two and three, would that mean that the second and third counts were valid, and therefore did not need a redo? Because one could argue that the first indictment was legit as far as the two counts the grand jury did find, with the crazy second indictment being brought after speaking to only two grand jury members being a superfluous moot process. And if two of the three counts were true-billed by the grand jury before the staff of limitations, then you would have six more months. Normally, I could assume the fact that Halligan made the effort to get a second indictment was proof that the first indictment was rendered invalid when one of the three counts was not true billed. But she is such an inexperienced incompetent dumb fuck, that assumption would be a mistake. if Halligan’s alleged fourth and fifth amendment violations (using privileged evidence between Comey and his attorney that was illegally put before the grand jury - and improperly telling the grand jury that it was up to Comey to give testimony about his innocence) are found to have occurred, then the first indictment is null for different reasons, and potentially not a legitimate indictment within the statute of limitations for that separate reason - regardless of whether the entire grand jury read the second indictment and voted. Finally, if Miss Colorado is not a duly appointed interim attorney general, she had no authority to sign the indictment, or any indictment, and that nullity would also seem to prevent the six extra months provision. I admit to being fascinated by all of this.
  4. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.582135/gov.uscourts.vaed.582135.212.0.pdf Team Comey’s legal team filed this Motion to Dismiss last night, and while not a quick read, is a great explanation of the various problems facing Halligan and Bondi - and his explanation why that criminal indictment should be dismissed with prejudice, forever precluding the government’s ability to charge him criminally for those same acts.
  5. if elected and has a type, he’s going to spend his entire career trying to fuck Boebert… or sit next to her to get handies during the State of the Union.
  6. Twice, look at the bold language in the quote. Seems to indicate that the six month add-on would not apply in this situation, as if the indictment was not proper in the first place and a nullity, that means no prior indictment was filed within the applicable statute of limitations. Which would seem to prohibit the filing of a new indictment within six months of the court finding this one not being a true bill in the first place within the statute of limitations. The fact that the many criminal practitioner legal commentators have focused on the statute of limitations having being passed - and none of them mentioning an extra six extra months - suggests to me that the additional six months is not an option here. Dunno.
  7. The last three minutes have raised the bar on spectacular FSU suckage lol
  8. TD. 14-3 NC State
  9. Nothing to see here, the economy is fine and everyone in the country has extra money. Great take.
  10. “Do something!” noted. And now, if you’ll excuse me, I will be drafting my “Motion to Make all the Bad Things in the Country Stop”. I’m puzzled why I did not think of that before.
  11. The present time is the first time that I have a reasonable belief that Russia will be imploding before it can take down Ukraine in any meaningful way. Russia is about to be so poor that the next leader might trade a return of all of the frozen Russian billions to leave Crimea and withdraw from Ukrainian territory it currently holds (including return of the stolen children). They will desperately need that money to provide its people potatoes and a repair of utilities/refining/electrical grid. Their destroyed refineries will take a while before they will be able to produce revenue again, hopefully with a sanctions removal provision requiring that a portion of that Russian oil and gas revenue goes to rebuild Ukraine.
×
×
  • Create New...