Jump to content

The Original Greaser Bob

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1790
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Original Greaser Bob

  1. 4 hours ago, Chewbacca said:

    Do you want to be excited by a candidate, or do you want to make sure Trump does not see the inside of the Oval Office again?

    I want dems to be excited about their candidate because being excited means more likely to vote. I don't think fearful voters have to get excited.  (That's what 2020 was about.)   A few things can happen before the election.  Trump could die, or simply not get the nomination. 

    The whole basis for my post is that assuming Biden is going to be running against Trump is a big assumption.   It's a good assumption but it's not a sure thing. 

    I think as of now I have to admit the incumbency status seems to be a pretty stout basis to stay the course.  But that is if they are both the nominees.

     

  2. 4 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

    When someone says Biden hasn't done a good job, ask for specifics

    I didn't say he's done a poor job.  I actually don't think Jimmy Carter did a poor job either but I'd hedge my bets against him as the nominee as well. 

    The question is, if the presumptive nominee for some reason wouldn't be able to run, would you be more or less excited by the replacement.  I actually like Kamala more, and she is one of my least favorite alternatives.

    Hard to believe I'm a complete outlier on that. 

  3. The only way not to be consumed by Trump news over the next year is for the Dems to  pivot to a younger candidate.  And that means younger than Elizabeth Warren for fucks sake.  Newsom, Whitmer, I don't really care.  

    Biden was a fine door stop but time to move on, and that means someone outside of his administration.  And someone other than an Abrams who has lost more than they've won.

    The Republican fucksticks need to be crushed and we need someone young at the top of the ticket.

    People need to be agrressive about moving Joe along.

     

  4. 11 minutes ago, Hondo said:

    Had we won that game, it would have been a travesty to Stanford and their fans.

    I don't know about that.  To me it felt like the  first game all over again.  I think Stanford folks realized they had gotten the benefit of the calls up to that point.  This one was brutal precisely because it was starting to feel like Texas was going to close it out.  At least to me.

  5. 11 minutes ago, Sir Ulrich said:

    Check back in two years when the Pac explodes and Stanford is relegated to thr MWC

    I'll actually check in daily.  But feel free to tickle the date. 

    And hopefully my two favorite teams will both host Super Regionals next year, so we don't have any lighting/broadcast issues.

  6. 8 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

    He should be embarrassed for his university.  2 OF's lose a ball in the (no) lights??   our light standards are twice as tall.  no wonder that shit kept happening in the regional.

    Come on dude.  Have a little pride.

    Stanford is the best all around university in the country -- by far.  We don't do embarrassment.  And the baseball field is quaint by big time standards but wonderful. 

    I'm not happy -- I was rooting for Texas just a bit more than Stanford. 

    • Fuck You 5
  7. 1 minute ago, Texzilla58 said:

    Would have rivaled Duvall as a great character actor if he’d had same longevity.

    Plus a better country singer.  The Coen Bros wrote wrote an entire screenplay plus some original songs for what they hoped would be Cazale staring as "Old Towns Van Zant".

    00af7c73-e939-411a-bf44-97e252c30a1d.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...