I finished this last night and the only critical commentary Iāve read on the movie has come from reading these 10 pages. Itās interesting to read the pages pre-release, at release, and then once consensus started to take shape.
I personally thought the Riddler character was an awesome interpretation. The character actually shined post-getting caught when his insanity was unhinged. I appreciated the modern application of the Riddler a la Zodiac killer, along with the costume and even the antisocial online community. I liked there was an attempt to show a connection between the comics and comic-book trope-y things, like how the marque bad guys have henchmen and followers. What I didnāt like about the Riddler was how far-fetched the plot got. A lot of it said, the 7 vans, and the online community on the deep web and how it was secret and not leaked, and the whole āplan on getting caught to finish the grand finaleā bad guy move. I also thought it was a strange writing move to head fake the audience like Riddler knew Batmanās identity, and having Batman deal with that anxiety, but it really just being pointed musings. It felt like the Riddler character would have been more put together than that. Also how he assumed Batman was on his side and cooperating felt like lazy writing for the character.
I thought the Westworld guy was a great casting choice; his voice and mannerisms were Batman-lite and I liked his involvement.
What I didnāt like was a lot of what was mentioned, taking bullets casually, etc. but even more what struck me was for such a long movie there wasnāt a lot of running exposition to give clarity on how Batman got to this point. How did the suit tech happen? How did he learn to fight as well as he did (Alfred mentioned teaching him, I guess?)? I think the other Batman movies do a good job of building up the operational and organizational design of Batman (including seeing his bat lair versus an old gothic mansion with an old maid).
As far as the emo and brooding, I didnāt think it all bad. I thought the journaling thing was going to be a whip but it wasnāt too heavy-handed and it gave insight into his journey. Heās a younger batman still processing and growing emotionally and part of that is necessarily emotional and messy. Most Batmanās we see on the screen have already more or less sort of figured the deeper emotional pain out versus showing the early catharsis of personifying vengeance. Maybe not Baleās in the first two.
I think we saw an immature Batman on purpose, as far as the utility for a trilogy, and thatās spelled out with his soliloquy in the end about being more than vengeance, which hit home when the nut job said that is who he was as well. The guy held a mirror to him and showed him they were more alike than not and that jarred him to grow, which I think we will all benefit from in Batman 2 with a more three dimensional Batman.