Jump to content

Doc Daneeka

Full Members
  • Posts

    3613
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Doc Daneeka

  1. Says who? Only the coaches’ poll was obligated to choose the BCS winner.
  2. “Didn’t play against Texas.” Solid trolling.
  3. Well, then which is it? All he cares about is winning or all he cares about is his pride? They appear incompatible.
  4. Especially when nearly all of North Carolina high school football has already moved past it.
  5. Ok, don’t. Texas is going to kick their skulls in, regardless.
  6. In his defense, A&M’s win wasn’t at all like Texas’ win.
  7. I mean, USC certainly needs someone who can fucking tackle when they have 11 in the box. Maybe that’s appealing.
  8. I don’t know how beating two teams that are clearly down would make people understand that, but ok.
  9. The glass is half full because he drank the other half of the moonshine before posting that bit of idiocy.
  10. If it turns out to be 180° off, was it rightly justified or wrongly premature?
  11. Good news and bad news. The bad news is that the feeds still hang now and again and the help ticket went unanswered. The good news is that the help ticket apparently triggered a refund but my access still works. I’ll call that a win for now as I look for another provider just in case.
  12. I read somewhere on here that it’s a left hamstring issue.
  13. Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European swallow.
  14. Auburn beat up OU and Alabama beat up Georgia. That’s what always happens in the SEC. No wonder the sips beat them both. They still haven’t been tested. The jury is still out.
  15. I thought he said he did practice. And, imo, implied that he might have gone back in the game but WR depth made it unnecessary to consider.
  16. Vaguely on topic, but it sounds like Sarkisian treats other teams’ injury reports largely as works of fiction, as he should.
  17. Yeah, who the hell knows but #5 is likely to be a very damned good team, perhaps better than 3 and 4. I think once you get 2 — which I guess means a one-loss SEC champion Texas with unbeaten, say, Ohio State at 1 — you’re probably looking at the ACC champions at 3. I think #5, though, is going to be loser of the SEC championship game. Maybe not if it’s UGA and Texas has beaten them twice (theoretically) but who knows. Without reseeding, everyone is going to be pulling for upsets, though, I think.
  18. You can only hope to contain him.
  19. If Clemson is looking at a 4 seed, all the more reason for Texas to want the 1. That would set up really nicely, imo.
  20. We’ll see what happens to Arkansas with a fully armed and operational Sarkisian roster. This little piggie went to market, is my guess. Last year’s OU game was a fuck up, no doubt. I don’t doubt that Sarkisian understands that game, though. Texas didn’t lose because Sarkisian’s team was overwhelmed by the intensity of the rivalry. It lost because it didn’t protect the ball, couldn’t score in the red zone, and, well, I’m trying to block out some of the defensive stuff. He has made effort specifically to address those failures. OU will feel the brunt of that. Arkansas is going to get kicked in the balls. A&M is going to get curbstomped on their own hallowed field. This is how Texas football is meant to be, and it’s about goddamned time to set the universe straight about that.
×
×
  • Create New...