Jump to content
Required Reading for any Longhorn ×

Doc Daneeka

Full Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3613

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Doc Daneeka

  1. Doc Daneeka
    I meant Texas loses to those maroon clowns if Sarkisian treats it as a scrimmage and is focused on the championship game because a loss makes no difference. Think an NFL team with playoff seeding determined going into the last week of the season.
  2. Doc Daneeka
    It would be kind of risky for Sarkisian to rest the starters going into the SEC championship, but maybe that will be the way to go with a playoff bye on the line.
  3. Doc Daneeka
    Well, once Street was running it rather than Bradley, anyway.
  4. Doc Daneeka
    Is it really a rivalry when one team has won every game in the series?
  5. Doc Daneeka
    No, fuck that answering a question with a question bullshit. You’re not intellectually honest enough to make an actual affirmative statement about your position, or why mine is flawed, but prefer to dance around talking without ever actually saying anything. That’s fine. Typical, even. You’ve made your approach clear and it’s just not that interesting.
  6. Doc Daneeka
    Ah, yes, the classic, “If you don’t know, I’m not going to tell you” approach. Always nice to see it. That you have time to type a bunch of bullshit but no time to enlighten, again, is pretty telling.
  7. Doc Daneeka
    Of course it is. You don’t read, you emote. And still refuse actually to make an affirmative statement about why using “biological woman” is problematic when determining who can compete against whom. How about you make your “succinct statement” and if it’s lost on me we can go from there?
  8. Doc Daneeka
    Yes, “biological woman” is a ridiculous term. Good luck with that.
  9. Doc Daneeka
    I feel like that may be an AI-generated image to go along with what reads like AI-generated text. Where the “I” in “AI” is doing a lot of heavy lifting.
  10. Doc Daneeka
    The part where using the term “biological woman” indicates to you that I haven’t taken a science class. The fact that you want to dance around without making any kind of clear and definitive statement about what your actual disagreement is telling.
  11. Doc Daneeka
    Then state your point directly, rather than trying to hint at something.
  12. Doc Daneeka
    Are you arguing that there is no such thing as a biological woman? I’m not sure exactly what point you’re trying to make.
  13. Doc Daneeka
    Perhaps you can point out my science error.
  14. Doc Daneeka
    I think you know where to start.
  15. Doc Daneeka
    My daughters were authorized users on a couple of my cards from the time they were 13 or so. They had their debit cards tied to student checking account as soon as I was able to open them. They’ve been budgeting and tracking since then. It’s my understanding that being authorized users did help them build a credit score. They were both 800+ by the time they were 19 which is way better than my dumb ass at their age. I’d be really surprised if you can get them their own before 18, but I’ve been surprised before. What kind of expense tracking are you talking about? For their benefit or yours? I’d think the cleanest way is to add them as authorized users on a card you don’t use. Tracking-wise, that’s the same as their own card.
  16. Doc Daneeka
    At least it’s not jaundice.
  17. Doc Daneeka
    “Wintergreen determined the outcome by throwing all communications from General Peckem into the wastebasket. He found them too prolix.” Just another reason why Catch-22 is the greatest novel of all time.
  18. Doc Daneeka
    That’s going to be a no from me, dawg.
  19. Doc Daneeka
    I didn’t say I didn’t care. I said it can say what it wants. Reading comprehension doesn’t seem to be your strong suit. Let me put it another way: Science says tomatoes are fruits. Good for science. That doesn’t drive whether they go in fruit salad. What I said was, and I’ll type it slowly for you, science can say what it wants to say but, for purposes of physical competition, imo, there are women and there is everyone else. There’s a reason the competition has been split You can argue edge cases all you want, but the edge cases compete against other edge cases and men.
  20. Doc Daneeka
    Yes, a “chud” who’s taken a history class. You beat the drum for knowing science. Beat the drum for knowing history. What kind of dumbfuck comeback is “Of course you’d know something that you’ve been taught since middle school”? What’s *really* going to surprise you, apparently, is who wanted them fully accounted for in the census and who didn’t even want them counted.
  21. Doc Daneeka
    It was 3/5. And they weren’t classified as 3/5 of a person. But don’t let the details get in the way. And this whole CF is about policy. Science can say whatever science wants to say. The entire discussion is about who competes against whom. Straight up biological women compete against others. Everyone else is in the men/open category.
  22. Doc Daneeka
    They can compete against men if there isn’t an intersex competition/league/event.
  23. Doc Daneeka
    Pretty sure the “culture war” reference, along with her job, meant he was talking about Ponder, not Griffin.
  24. Doc Daneeka
    Yes, it was. He was also a beating, but that’s been resolved.
  25. Doc Daneeka
    https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/16/judge-temporarily-blocks-sports-streaming-service-venu-ruling-in-favor-of-fubo-tv-on-antitrust-concerns.html “A U.S. judge on Friday temporarily blocked sports streaming service Venu from launch ahead of the NFL season.” Stumbling block or more?

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...