Jump to content

Josef Pwag

Full Members
  • Posts

    788
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

2446 Surly 10%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I'm confused. The house settelment puts a cap on what the schools themselves can pay, but I thought NIL was still uncapped. How does putting a cap on NIL jibe with the unanimous Alston SCOTUS decision? Here is what ChatGPT told me...is this wrong? What the House settlement caps: Schools that opt into the settlement will be allowed to pay current Division I athletes directly from school revenue—up to an annual cap. That cap starts at $20.5 million per school for the 2025‑26 academic year and is expected to increase by about 4% annually over the next decade (potentially reaching around $33 million) uscannenbergmedia.com+15cbssports.com+156abc.com+15. What they didn’t cap: third‑party NIL deals Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) money that athletes receive from third-party sources—such as individual endorsement deals, collectives, or boosters—is not counted against the school’s revenue-sharing cap. These deals remain unlimited in terms of the amount, as long as they reflect fair market value and serve a valid business purpose
  2. With the D-line class we will have, if we get these 2 monster OTs, I'm content.
  3. I would say it captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. We are about to have 3 additional 5-stars in the bag.
×
×
  • Create New...