LOL, another NIL thread about a school-other-than-Texas where @RGBIII is immediately shitting on it and telling everyone how "illegal" it is! We get it dude we heard the podcast, you spent 30 years studying the in's-and-out's of NIL law and you know it better than the compliance departments, yada yada yada.
I'm fairly certain you haven't seen the contract this recruit signed. You're reading a 2nd or 3rd hand characterization of it and making black and white assumptions. That's dumb. With the lawyers involved, it's probably legal. "Spirit" of NIL is just bullshit that people trot out when they feel mad that someone else got one over on them.
Not illegal:
Not inducement: it's written into the terms itself per the Athletic. You can argue all you want about how this contract and aggy are actually bags and they'll cut off the players but ain't none of that in the contract itself and verbal doesn't count.
Not pay for play: the player can go to another school from wherever he originally signs and retain the benefit of the contract, JUST LIKE JARED WILEY is with Burnt Ends (said you on the podcast) even though he's transferred to TCU.
Not a college-enrolled student-athlete: you're getting your panties knotted on this. Per Opendorse, if this recruit is in California (likely), Utah, Nebraska, Kansas, New York and a number of other states they are legally allowed to sign NIL deals as a high-school student. Unlike QE here in Texas unfortunately.
Aside from definitely not being illegal, even if it were, who exactly is going to enforce any rules breaking? Not the toothless NCAA. So long as a NIL collective can provide the basic stamp of legality, we'll see the edges on this keep getting pushed out further and further until someone finds a line to cross. Of course that won't be Texas, because we're purer than the driven snow, by gaud.