Jump to content

nbmishoid

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nbmishoid

  1. GW He was simply making a reasonable conjecture, prior to examining more trial stuff. Simma down, now.
  2. Lots of analysis on this thread, sums to an early realization: the teams are closely matched. UW’s nations best passing attack should have a very good outing on our pass D, subject to whatever trouble our front 4 might generate. Our offense against their D looks good on paper, but their experience level is likely to even out much of that gap. And our great special teams are pretty well matched up by UW. Both teams had several games where they played below their best, and had to learn how to win. Having watched the two Oregon games plus USC, I am biased as those were 3 of their very best offensive outings. As of a month ago, I didn’t think UT was of the same capability as UW, that we just didn’t look as good. Then we began to look real good. Tremendous bias on my part in the wake of those games. Really hard to pick this game. But I have to pick UT straight up. The team has earned some confidence.
  3. I have gotten used to CTJ’s style, even when he’s calling me a dumbass. But Sark and crew have less background and may not appreciate what they are reading
  4. Definitely no purity balls in Killeen, in the 70’s. Not even much soap.
  5. Wouldn’t anymcourt demand the doc be produced for the court and for the defense?
  6. The real issue to complain about is how utterly disinteresting the early bowls are. 1 out of 5 last week, 0 for 5 today. It wasn’t always so, eh?
  7. Caution is the only perspective for we horns still with remnants of PTSD. If our great offense shows up, the one McElroy fawned over, I’d have to like our chances. Sort of repeating myself ad nauseum
  8. Alpha, thx. I’m back on the Texas offense bandwagon against this D
  9. nbmishoid

    LBGTQ

    WA telling Texas to fuck off. Reason number 666 for living here
  10. Ok, but he’s not the overarching badass as was that character
  11. nbmishoid

    LBGTQ

    Powerful analogy, deepens understanding
  12. That poster is clearly supportive of actions required. Not necessarily your fear mongering list. The right bitches, being bitchs
  13. Again, not how it works. Everyone is in. Anyone can add other savings accounts. Anyone can forego payments. You seem to think the last two statements invalidate the first. Only in your one track brain cell.
  14. Open all the private accounts you wish. No one is stopping you. That is no reason to gut every one else’ insurance
  15. Sure, the average citizen is not financially clever. That is why the system is here. Sorry you don’t have the means to afford the deduction. Oh, you can? And you still complain. Finally, again you omit the catastrophic societal outcomes, which would overwhelm your simple minded logic. Most of us considered and rejected your logic upon reaching adulthood
  16. Hammer It has been explained above. Your framing purposefully omits the many catastrophic societal outcomes. Thus your argument is bullshit, and you have the morals of a snake, biblically speaking
  17. In a word, bullshit. What planet are you on? Sure, this will get real support
  18. More like Blood Meridian, with R’s as the gang. Don’t know who the R Judge would be
×
×
  • Create New...