I don't find your view on homelessness extreme. It is a rather complicated issue, and there is no "right answer" in my opinion, due to the various realties of the issues. Should cities/municipalities/communities have the right to ban certain unwanted activities? Sure, within reason. I don't think anyone is against nuisance or noise ordinances. People need to able to coexist in peace. What makes it complicated is the human element. No one wants to live where the unhoused are allowed to obstruct normal society due to their inability to obtain/afford housing. "Where should they go?" and "Are you seriously criminalizing poverty?" are very legitimate questions that don't have easy answers. The hard truth is existing requires consuming resources and expending waste. Additionally, the rest of society works and pays fees to exist without acting like a bunch of animals fighting each other for resources and land. This group doesn't want non-contributors taking a shit on the sidewalk they paid for, and they shouldn't feel bad for requesting that prohibition. Of course, the unhoused are human beings, and every effort should be made to house, feed, and provide resources in the hopes that they may no longer need said assistance. At the same time, people that refuse to accept help and work towards becoming independent shouldn't be allowed to camp wherever they want.