Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    16930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. Because he was generally quite good at pass protection. His PFF ratings and eventual draft position will confirm that.
  2. No he didn't. He was a bit inconsistent, but very far from terrible.
  3. Pass protection was pretty good. Cam would occasionally get beat in high profile ways, but overall was solid. However, he was pretty bad against Ohio State but he was also playing injured. Our interior was far more of a problem than our tackles.
  4. Pretty sure he had several games with similar streaks.
  5. He was basically in the very middle of the field, lined up just outside the tackle (ball was on the left hash).
  6. I don't think they know how to do that.
  7. No worries. But ball was on the 25 and #3 was standing on the 30.
  8. I'm not the one that brought it up. But if we're going to bitch about it, we should know what we are bitching about. It wasn't that unusual of a call and it shouldn't have resulted in a screen going for 75 yards absent a bunch of people not doing their jobs.
  9. No. We brought 4. Guilbeau came from the nickel, but only like 5 yards back. And I believe it was Simmons that dropped back in coverage. The problem was that no one recognizes the screen.
  10. I mean, they play man defense like 80% of the time. Only so much variety you can have with that.
  11. While this is true, it is a bit weird in the context of a drive that only worked because the QB was used as a battering ram.
  12. Good drive. I have doubts it is sustainable for the full game unless Leonard is a robot.
  13. It is really odd to conflate civil suits against someone in their official capacity for the purpose of challenging their legal authority (e.g., a lawsuit that the official cannot do a course action) or lawsuits against someone in their personal capacity for damages (e.g., a defamation suit) with criminal prosecution by the government. Like, those things aren't even kind of the same thing. I'm not sure how the first one could ever constitute the "targeting of political enemies." The fact that he is unable to see how criminal prosecution is qualitatively different is stupefying.
  14. I'm arguing that you're talking out of your ass. See @TwiceHorn's posts.
  15. I see. You can conflate of bunch of things that are conceptually different, confuse opinions with facts, have no idea how to link something, and have a very loose understanding of history.
  16. How are private lawsuits and the weaponization of justice department related? You understand those are completely different things, right?
  17. What does the liability of a third party (the manufacturer) have to do with this supposed agent-principal relationship? More importantly, your concern here in this scenario as you've defined it is about the ability of the agent to punish a principal? Normally, the problem is the principal's inability to punish an agent, not vice versa.
  18. You've conflated a liability system designed to address disputes regarding responsibility for injuries with agency. They are not one and the same. The manufacturer isn't an agent and isn't acting under principles of agency.
  19. Yeah, but worse the year before that.
  20. It happens, but it is rare. Generally if the dispute is worth going to court over the person will hire an attorney and you wouldn't end up in small claims court.
  21. I'm an attorney. There is no specific statute. Common law controls here. The question is what damages did the person have as a result of the accident. Again, the general goal of the tort system is make the person whole. Comparable transportation follows from that aim. I don't know what you mean about the last part. People go to court all the time when insurers refuse to pay reasonable compensation. Smalls claims isn't any different than filing any other lawsuit.
  22. Rough couple of minutes...
×
×
  • Create New...