Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    19989
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. Penn St fighting this set. Let's kick it up horns.
  2. I don't think you can say that with that beat down. Committee is looking for a reason to have both Miami and Notre Dame in. Alabama may have just given it to them.
  3. Which is why you don't release rankings. But I'm also not convinced they are in.
  4. Alabama shouldn't have been a shoe in before the conference game. That was the mistake of releasing rankings.
  5. Yeah. We are just a good, but flawed team this year.
  6. Yeah, but it isn't fun to think that way.
  7. Probably. I'm unclear if we want to root for Duke to make the ACC (and by extension Notre Dame) to look as weak as possible or root for Virginia so the committee isn't facing a no ACC scenario if they keep Miami out.
  8. I guess we may be testing this scenario. I maintain there shouldn't have been any playoff rankings until tomorrow. There would be no discussion of anyone getting punished for losing in the championship games. They would just be more data points and opportunities for teams to prove they belong. At the very most, if you have to have weekly shows, just do groupings of 10.
  9. This game would be more interesting if the committee didn't release any ratings until Sunday. That's just the clearly better way to do things. No one would have been saying that Bama with a losses to OU and FSU was guaranteed in the playoffs, so there would be no concern of "punishing" someone for playing the conference championship. It would just be another chance for a team to prove it belongs, which is how it should be.
  10. Georgia has started playing better, particularly on defense. Alabama peaked in the Georgia game.
  11. Not really. It was a 4 point game in the 4th quarter until Georgia went all out on some great 4th downs and a onside kick. BYU was never in the game
  12. You partially solve this problem by not having any rankings until after all regular season and conference championships are played. No one should really know where they stand.
  13. And I think we'd all argue it shouldn't be.
  14. If you can beat every other team, what does it matter? Aggies shouldn't be allowed to have opinions about football.
  15. We would have been out last year despite being the team that came closest to challenging Ohio State. It would be a bad rule.
  16. I don't agree with that at all. Sometimes it can just be a bad matchup.
  17. Can BYU's QB not see red?
  18. Tech's defense looks pretty good. That's all I can say from this game. Everything else looks thoroughly mediocre.
  19. Yes you would. You're terrible.
  20. It very clearly does not.
  21. Texas offense was very much special ed at the time. So yes.
  22. I have no words for that play
  23. I have no idea what he thought could have happened to make it down at the one.
  24. The same rating that has North Texas at #13 and Texas at #21? Does it really track for you that Texas and Navy should be similarly ranked teams? I mean, look at this shit, it is absolute nonsense: team rating record SOS: rank top 25 wins top 50 wins best game 1. Ohio St 0.966931 12-0 0.544753: 45 3 4 W: #17 Michigan 2. Indiana 0.952599 12-0 0.528032: 58 2 5 W: #5 Oregon 3. BYU 0.922476 11-1 0.576222: 29 2 5 W: #14 Utah 4. Georgia 0.907745 11-1 0.559036: 36 2 4 W: #8 Mississippi 5. Oregon 0.896224 11-1 0.545594: 44 1 3 W: #16 USC 6. Texas A&M 0.882251 11-1 0.529293: 56 1 3 W: #10 Notre Dame 7. Oklahoma 0.878466 10-2 0.608210: 11 2 5 W: #9 Alabama 8. Mississippi 0.878307 11-1 0.524691: 59 2 3 W: #7 Oklahoma 9. Alabama 0.853778 10-2 0.579408: 23 2 5 W: #4 Georgia 10. Notre Dame 0.852777 10-2 0.578240: 24 2 5 W: #16 USC 11. Texas Tech 0.852184 11-1 0.494215: 88 2 3 W: #3 BYU 12. Miami (FL) 0.822636 10-2 0.543076: 47 2 4 W: #10 Notre Dame 13. North Texas 0.815733 11-1 0.451688: 106 1 1 W: #22 Navy 14. Utah 0.805918 10-2 0.523570: 62 0 1 W: #28 Arizona St 15. Vanderbilt 0.805220 10-2 0.522757: 63 0 3 W: #34 Tennessee 16. USC 0.804544 9-3 0.605301: 12 1 2 W: #17 Michigan 17. Michigan 0.801094 9-3 0.601277: 14 0 2 W: #33 Washington 18. Virginia 0.789173 10-2 0.504036: 80 0 2 W: #35 Louisville 19. James Madison 0.788659 11-1 0.420102: 117 0 1 W: #36 Old Dominion 20. Tulane 0.784777 10-2 0.498906: 84 0 3 W: #46 East Carolina 21. Texas 0.773722 9-3 0.569342: 31 3 3 W: #6 Texas A&M 22. Navy 0.760277 9-2 0.489418: 92 1 2 W: #25 South Florida 23. Arizona 0.740408 9-3 0.530476: 53 0 1 W: #28 Arizona St 24. Illinois 0.717287 8-4 0.586835: 20 1 2 W: #16 USC 25. South Florida 0.716153 9-3 0.502179: 81 1 2 W: #13 North Texas 26. Georgia Tech 0.714308 9-3 0.500027: 83 0 2 W: #40 Wake Forest 27. Houston 0.706716 9-3 0.491169: 90 1 2 W: #23 Arizona 28. Arizona St 0.703010 8-4 0.570179: 30 1 3 W: #11 Texas Tech 29. TCU 0.695792 8-4 0.561758: 34 0 2 W: #27 Houston 30. UNLV 0.688470 10-2 0.386549: 134 0 0 W: #55 Hawaii 31. Iowa St 0.687375 8-4 0.551938: 40 1 3 W: #23 Arizona 32. Iowa 0.683335 8-4 0.547224: 42 0 0 W: #51 Minnesota 33. Washington 0.682037 8-4 0.545710: 43 1 1 W: #24 Illinois 34. Tennessee 0.676912 8-4 0.539731: 48 0 0 W: #70 Kentucky 35. Louisville 0.670377 8-4 0.532107: 52 2 3 W: #12 Miami (FL) 36. Old Dominion 0.666249 9-3 0.443958: 107 0 0 W: #60 Troy 37. Missouri 0.661548 8-4 0.521806: 64 0 0 W: #72 Auburn 38. Pittsburgh 0.661194 8-4 0.521393: 65 0 2 W: #26 Georgia Tech 39. LSU 0.655328 7-5 0.597882: 16 0 0 W: #56 Clemson 40. Wake Forest 0.654649 8-4 0.513757: 75 1 3 W: #18 Virginia 41. NC State 0.654448 7-5 0.596856: 17 1 4 W: #18 Virginia 42. Kennesaw State 0.651044 9-3 0.426218: 114 0 0 W: #74 Missouri St 43. New Mexico 0.650783 9-3 0.425914: 115 0 2 W: #30 UNLV 44. SMU 0.647760 8-4 0.505720: 79 1 2 W: #12 Miami (FL) 45. Boise St 0.638219 8-4 0.494589: 87 0 2 W: #30 UNLV 46. East Carolina 0.637466 8-4 0.493710: 89 0 1 W: #49 Memphis 47. Duke 0.637324 7-5 0.576878: 28 0 2 W: #40 Wake Forest 48. San Diego St 0.630016 9-3 0.401685:
×
×
  • Create New...