Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    19314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. Arch has been bad. Good news, so has the run blocking.
  2. Weird you ignored the whole redoing of the vote on MMRV vaccines. Yesterday, they removed the recommendation for the MMRV vaccine for children under 4 generally, but voted to uphold access through the federal Vaccines for Children program. Today, they reversed the second part. So, now the combined vaccine is no longer covered under the federal program and those that rely on it will not have access to the MMRV vaccine. And no discussion from you regarding why this vote was tabled. It turns out, there is no evidence of any harm by having the child vaccinated within 24 hours and there is a ton of data that shows not vaccinating could be dangerous. And of course, you continue the bullshit of equating a recommendation with forcing vaccination. And you ignore the proposed vote this morning was actually more akin to the type of governmental coercion than any recommendation that a vaccine be administered because it expressly stated that "The first dose of the Hepatitis B vaccine is not given until the child is at least one month old". Again, the actual science and the weighing of risk/benefit don't matter to you.
  3. I'll add the previous CDC guidance favored the two shot option, but said both were safe and effective and could be used. That is what has been taken away today. And this is all over a slight increase in an almost entirely harmless side effect. It is about taking away choice, not protecting it. Framing this as anything else is incredibly disingenuous (par for the course for Annie).
  4. Recommendations don't force anything. They are simply guidance and are one component when considering the standard of care. You know this. And you know removing recommendations can and does impact insurance coverage. So while making the recommendation doesn't force anyone's hand, removing the recommendation does. And you know the decisions being made aren't being made based upon science or evidence. There is precious little of that in support of their decisions using any risk benefit assessment. The movement in every session is the same, give credence to bullshit conspiracy theories, question well established science, ignore typical evidence based reasoning, ignore judgment of clinicians, and do so all in favor of anything that expresses vaccine skepticism and makes vaccines incrementally more difficult to access. You constantly attempt to white wash these decision even though we all know you see the truth.
  5. Your logic doesn't logic and your criticism of Babers is nonsensical given your post. It actually sounds like you agree with him. No one believes that showing out against Sam Houston State necessarily means our problems are solved moving forward. All we are saying is that struggling against Sam Houston State likely means the problems on offense aren't solvable this season.
  6. Yes, I do. And unlike you, I actually care about other people. And I also understand the CDC recommendations affect availability and insurance coverage. The no vote will impact availability for some people. The no vote was made without regard to the science or the opinions of clinicians. Even Meissner pointed out that this was a settled debate in voting against the rejection of established science.
  7. So... then why are you critical of Babers pointing out that struggling against Sam Houston State probably means were headed towards a waterfall?
  8. This has been thoroughly hashed out before. The incidents happen. They aren't severe. They are overwhelming very short lived and very mild. Any rational observation has this not moving the needle on the risk-benefit scale. You of course ignore all that and continue to cover for the anti-science lunacy.
  9. And? Dude. Struggling against Sam Houston State on offense would significantly decrease the probability that the offense can get to any acceptable level this year. Yes, one game doesn't make a season. But it sure as shit can be a harbinger of what is to come.
  10. Well, it isn't like HV battery is scrapped just because it failed. Those are repaired/reused. So, you shouldn't feel as bad on the climate side of things.
  11. I don't know how you missed watching Simon. He was very clearly the best back after Baxter went out. Clark was marginal and didn't seem game ready. Not surprising given his injury and the time off.
  12. It can be a bit of both. Our line at times the last couple of years would have an inability to move people and get the tough yards. Our zone blocking was generally really good and gave good lanes for our backs even without the real push up front. But when we tried to simply overpower in short yardage situations, we really struggled even against teams that were at distinct talent disadvantages. That said, I agree with your general point that rushing against the top defenses will be a struggle for any team. This year's offensive line is really bad at zone blocking so we really have to be able to get push. Unfortunately, they aren't consistently good at that either.
  13. Ash didn't need defenders. He was very good when healthy. He needed to not get concussions.
  14. The owner of a Tesla can literally pull up the car's exact location on their phone at any time. Even if he had lent the car out, he would still be able to do that. You also get all sorts of notifications on the car's status.
  15. Maybe. But in the video it did appear Wingo had geared down was just trotting. Given Arch's apparently inability to throw anything but fastballs, I actually though Wingo's slow drift to the middle of the field was helping him get in a window for Arch to throw in.
  16. But Babers is right. If the offense struggles against Sam Houston State, it means very bad things for this season.
  17. And, uh, here is the advertised list of trainees: I... don't think that is good a thing.
  18. Yeah, pretty clear watching these videos where the strange mechanics are coming from. I don't know enough to know if this is good training or bad. But at the very least, it appears to have been something akin to trying rework a swing right before the start of the season. If you're going to do this, you do it at the beginning of an off season, not at the end of it. No wonder Arch is out of whack.
  19. Arch has to be able to complete them. And our line and receivers have to be able to block them. Neither of those things are happening consistently right now.
  20. Maybe that is why they look so unpracticed. Our defense blows everything up, so they never get a chance to really practice. (only mostly not serious)
  21. I'd also say the defense is in the same S&C program. We have no issues there, so I'm pretty confident the problem isn't our S&C training. The offensive side of the ball just has bad and poorly taught players.
  22. Gluttons for punishment.
  23. Go ahead and explain how Ketanji Jackson is not smart and unqualified. Let me know what basis you have besides racism and sexism.
  24. Right, you think horrific, horrible things aren't horrific. thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...