Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    19128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. He played his ass off last night.
  2. I know people think Arch looked better last season. But we saw many of the same things we are seeing this season. He is all or nothing. He can't throw the short or intermediate routes. He can throw deep and that is about it. I do think he fucked up his mechanics over the summer and that is part of why we are getting these dirt balls. I was hopeful he finally got that shit out of his system, but it came back against Kentucky. As long as he is doing that, a better line isn't helping. He has zero touch. None. He can rifle the ball and that is it. He is an extremely limited QB right now. If we had an all world line and a strong run game, maybe we could get away with a run heavy game plan aiming for 10-15 passes a game. But it would still be bad QB play.
  3. "we're going to do with smiles on our faces" as Arch looks like a beat dog.
  4. Has that been our problem? We are playing our tackles at guard now? That is probably why no one knows their assignment.
  5. Every single QB we have faced, except possibly Sam Houston's, would be better than Arch in our offense. It sucks, but it is true. He is just wildly inconsistent. When he plays like UTEP or Kentucky Arch, we simply have no chance to function on offense.
  6. No. It is based upon the fact that there are literally dozens of highschool QBs that would be better than Arch right now. We would have to completely miss every QB eval to end up with one of them not being better than Arch. It is frustrating because clearly Arch has the talent to make big time NFL throws, and he does it fairly regularly. But he combines that with inability to make any basic throws or reads. He just isn't playable when it is like this. Arch may one day be a good QB. He just isn't capable right now. I hope at some point it clicks for him. But year 3, and 7 games into the season, Im just not seeing a growth trajectory. We are right back to UTEP level of play from him. How do you not see this?
  7. Manning isn't the best QB on the roster. He is barely a QB.
  8. The line isn't good. But it wouldn't look as bad if Manning was a division 1 QB.
  9. No. He didn't.
  10. I'm sorry. There is no game plan that works with a QB that can't throw to wide open receivers. This irrational belief that we just need to call different plays and Manning will look good is ridiculous. For whatever reason, some games he can perform and other games he can't. The only one that can fix this Manning (or a different QB).
  11. Receivers are open. They aren't the primary problem. It is Arch. He is bad. The line is bad too. But Arch would be bad with a good line.
  12. Arch would not see the field for any other major program. He probably wouldn't see the field for the majority of non major programs.
  13. No we weren't. Tre was doing a good job navigating outside zone against OU's slants. But he was having to dodge guys in the backfield to make it work. I worried that it wasn't repeatable. But we don't really know because we didn't even try running outside zone yesterday. Fify.
  14. Thinking about it, I actually think it is the same problem we saw against Ohio State. Arch processes slow, but when he does see where to throw the ball he then rushes the throws. With screens, Arch knows where the ball is supposed to go, so he rushed the screen rather than let it develop.
  15. Yeah, it was clear Tre had a limited pitch count. I don't understand why we did just use Simon instead of not running. But I also don't understand why when we did run, we choose shit like that nonsense first play of OT. The team showed it could run outside zone and inside zone. Why not do that?
  16. He navigates the pocket really well. I don't know why he cant use that to convert the easy passes to wide open receivers.
  17. We didn't even run outside zone, the thing that we demonstrated we could actually run last week.
  18. Arch sucks at throwing screens. He either floats it to the receiver, giving the defense a ton of time to blow it up or throws it immediately before it can develop, usually rifling it somewhere that takes away all the receivers momentum. We ran like 10 against OU and all but maybe 2 went for negative or short yardage.
  19. A very large part of it is Arch's inability to consistently throw short passes. Another very large part of it is game plan. Outside zone feasted against OU. We didn't run it all against Kentucky. What the fuck are we trying to do on offense? Regardless, if Arch just hits the wide open hot reads, teams would have to stop blitzing.
  20. David Ash did not suck. What the fuck are you talking about?
  21. Bowl game? You may be a bit over confident.
  22. The line isn't good. Arch makes it look worse than it is. Teams blitz with impunity because Arch cannot read it or hit a hit route.
  23. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Maybe Georgia's defense scores 17-24 points.
  24. To be fair to Wingo, why on earth would we have Arch try and throw the football again this game?
  25. That was the least clutch performance I have ever seen.
×
×
  • Create New...