What in god's name are you talking about? Nothing about me "hating Elon" has anything to do with this. The US Government shouldn't be asking the American public to buy the stock of a private entity, much less a private entity owned by an apparent current head of a government department. Again, if this was Soros and Biden, you'd be screaming your head off, and rightly so. I mean, fuck, go look at my posts in this thread on others. I've been much more in the defending Elon camp than in the hating (issues from this year notwithstanding).
As to "Executive Office", you'll notice I didn't capitalize that in my original post because I wasn't making reference to the specific "Executive Office", but rather the general executive branch. As far as general principles go, I cannot imagine why you'd think this distinction matters here.
Tim Walz (not Waltz) is allowed to criticize a private entity if he wishes. There isn't anything improper about that. Both state and federal government officials criticize private entities all the time (Trump does it on a daily basis). It may become improper if threatens freedom of speech or some other right, but that isn't this case. The case with begging the public to buy a private entity's stock is different. There is no public benefit to it, merely a private a one. Using government resources for the sole purpose of enriching a singular private entity (as opposed to the public generally) is absolutely improper. Doing so for the benefit of someone closely connect, if not part of, the current administration amplifies the problem.
I suggest you actually look up the definition of "hypocritical" because one of us is being it, and it isn't me.