Jump to content

Rex Kramer

Full Members
  • Posts

    2068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rex Kramer

  1. Flag burning was mentioned by fantana. Boston Tea Party of Madisonā€™s day, more destructive to the mothership than burning a flag, would suggest Iā€™m wrong in my supposition of what he was thinking at the time. However, I seriously doubt Madison and like minded crafters of the FA wrote it with terrorist sympathizers, wanting to eradicate any culture reminiscent of the colonies, Britain, Europe, etc. Again, Iā€™m not against this speech. Itā€™s protected. I just take issue with Madisonā€™s purported intent here.
  2. Goddamnit youā€™re gonna make me work here, arenā€™t you? Why donā€™t you take my word for it.
  3. It wasnt me. I donā€™t agree with ethnic cleansing. I also donā€™t agree with your definition of ethnic cleansing. Anyway, post what Guest said. Letā€™s read it.
  4. You and fantana and Ana seem to think Madison and others seemingly conceptualized such outrageous, specific behavior 235 years ago. They did not. You also seem to think Iā€™m against it. Iā€™m not, really - I think they are idiots like most of you, but do not care theyā€™re able to protest, within reason. I vehemently disagree with those critical of Abbott and Hartzell, but that is another discussion. Authors of FA most certainly did not contemplate burning flags, protests celebrating an enemy of our state and openly discussing burning down our society. I am not opining whatsoever of what Madisonā€™s opinion would have been if such protests. Iā€™m simply saying such scenarios were not in his mind. He was trying to protect much less exhibionist, less shocking, reasonable gripes. I repeat, there are zero worthy protests in my lifetime, save for some LG protests in the late 70s when I was barely alive. Before that, Vietnam and Civil Rights protests of the 60s and Suffrage of the 10s. That is it from the last 124 years. Everything else is nonsense.
  5. This was dated 9 years ago. The change occurred in the last 2. Iā€™ll look for it. Didnā€™t mean to say refined product as in gasoline. Talking about condensate. It has the net effect of inflating our daily production by like 500-800k bopd.
  6. Their fields are in decline particularly Ghawar. It hasnā€™t. Itā€™s increased tremendously, no doubt, off of Covid lows, which makes the statistic less impressive, but it has increased over 2019 levels. But that percentage increase is minuscule and the only reason we are setting records is because daily oil in 2019 was just that, whereas now the figure includes oil and refined product. I do not understand why the market doesnā€™t even talk about this.
  7. Oh I know what itā€™s evolved to. It was NOT crafted with terrorist sympathizers and flag burners in mind. Far dumber people than James Madison are responsible for what it is now. Someone who runs circles around bolverk and fantana and is impervious to your drive-by smug condescension?
  8. I donā€™t agree with what is being protested at all. The protestors are saying truly deplorable hateful shit, and should be outed. Rarely do modern protests have any effect other than to enrage people or to disrupt people who werenā€™t against them, so that theyā€™re completely against them. I cannot think of a single successful protest in my lifetime. I go out of my way to avoid any engagement or proximity to any protest. There is zero purpose to being within view or earshot of one.
  9. Itā€™s an indefensible point and yet here you are defending it.
  10. The first amendment was designed for people to proclaim the society that has provided for them should be dismantled? Lol. This is red meat for waste-everyoneā€™s-time FA attorneys, and nothing more. The FA was not crafted with such stupidity in mind. Itā€™s the leftā€™s step toward Idioicracy.
  11. Great work Jewish Kenny Powers.
  12. But hey, they have their freedom. Less money, debt, and irrelevance. But freedom from the tyrannical Ticket.
  13. Man I thought so too. Hard to get balls to him with X and JT and the backs, and then last year with AD. But I still agree with you. His production at Texas wasnā€™t what it could have been. He never complained, he just threw some blocks. Sark loved him, and I always watched this kid since high school. I hope he has a very long productive career. Love the kid.
  14. Been silent because been pretty busy. The bolded shows your comprehension is lacking sorely. First, of course these can both happen at the same time. ā€œFundamentalā€ change is a trend. Weā€™re going through one now. Even though Iā€™ve stated what it is dozens of times, you probably have no idea what Iā€™m talking about. Conflating any ā€œfundamental changeā€ usage with the obvious comment that fundamentals are always changing in some sort of gotcha moment isā€¦special. Unless you change your tone and are interested in discussing/learning, thisā€™ll be the last post of yours I respond to.
  15. I was early on natural gas but also said it probably wouldnā€™t start until winter which is why I gave myself a range of time that youā€™re so critical of. Do you not remember when I was openly questioning the thread on whether I should hedge? I didnā€™t. So I was early on gas and not late. I mean all you have to do is read my posts. I suspect you do not understand them. The fundamentals have and will continue to change. Iā€™ve also said repeatedly it wonā€™t be evident to the market, much less idiots like you, for awhile. Iā€™ve been saying since I returned to the board (a year ago?) the fundamentals changing will be evident in ā€˜24 or ā€˜25. Gas will start before oil. The fundamental I study most is (domestic) supply. Marcellus and Haynesville have peaked. Bakken and Eagle Ford have peaked. Permian will probably in ā€˜25.
  16. You copied posts by ā€œGuestā€. I had one major whiff in 2014 when I said oil would be back at $75 by Q3ā€™15. On the old site. I challenge you to find just one incorrect thing Iā€™ve said. One.
  17. Provide links. Youā€™re about to be on ignore by everyone in here.
  18. Most of what I have posted is correct or turns out to be correct. Youā€™re just too simple to pay attention over time. I donā€™t understand your second paragraph and am not gonna try. You clearly didnā€™t understand the comparison I was drawing between you and cold weather in Dallas means global warming is a myth guy. To make it really simple, thatā€™s you in this thread. I agree you are fucking embarrassing.
  19. When this guy wades in here, his irrelevant political bait is akin to some idiot discussing his localeā€™s freezing weather in a global warming argument.
  20. Laugh all you want pal. If you post incendiary political bullshit Iā€™ll just keep repeating myself.
  21. This admin had been very hostile to energy. Granholm calmed down tremendously because she smartly realized her early attitude had been antagonistic and unhelpful. But they still did stupid shit like slow down future LNG projects. Any records we are setting arenā€™t records in fact, because the EIA changed the way they account for bopd. Itā€™s also irrelevant to the Biden admin and has everything to do technology, drilling best wells and price environment to do so. The hostilities will rear their heads when inability to explore in other areas result in higher commodity prices. Iā€™m fine with this, and it will not likely occur into well into the next admin, where they will get blamed for it. It is a matter of time before the apples-to-oranges ā€œrecordsā€ we are setting from a domestic production standpoint stop and go down month after month. This will be apparent in the next 12 months I would bet.
  22. Theyā€™re done. They donā€™t have the personnel to engineer multiple long winning streaks. Iā€™d look for them to spend money on CF, RF, 1B, another OFā€™er and another C. This team should look totally different next year. I bet of the 12 or so guys with 400+ AB, 6 are different next year. This team careerā€™ed last year. Glad we stole one. We were the best team in 2011. We were not last year.
Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...