Jump to content

Rex Kramer

Full Members
  • Posts

    2,065
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rex Kramer

  1. Agreed on all, but it’s eye opening that we are getting some reporting from a journalist that actively held an Israeli woman hostage. I suspect that was 956’s point, and you’re focusing on stupid quotes of that hostage.
  2. Because of the success and severity of October 7th. On the heels of 20 years of Hamas strengthening with very overt Iranian support. Do you question Israel invading Gaza at all? Do you think they should’ve had an initial invasion, wipe out a chuck of Hamas, then left? Atrocities will occur in war and particularly when you’re fighting a group like Hamas. I still do not get your question about Lebanon being a failed state. Not sure what point you’re making to me here. And I fail to see why giving Palestine a MILITARY and STATE as a reward for its leadership’s barbaric act would even be on the table. I’m pretty sure you didn’t make that point - it was DixonHur - but you sure seem to be giving it some thought.
  3. I think he was probably speaking of a US tax shielded journalist writing about this, and his doctor father, complicit with or members of Hamas. Just guessing.
  4. Yet you do just that. Aggressively mocking those with whom you disagree (ad infinitum) makes you appear a most unserious individual. I’m aware of all of this. I still have no idea what point you’re trying to make.
  5. Yeah because I believe everyone who supports Palestine is a pedophile. Seriously? Read earlier in that thread.
  6. It was a joke. Hank was poking fun at my hyperbole about how I was shocked things were in dispute. This is right in line with your disingenuous nature. And I note how you did read my response but cannot effectively argue against it. So you resort to twisting words and copying/pasting snippets of responses totally out of context. All of this renders you totally ineffective in these arguments. You want to hate and belittle. There is no attempt to change minds. Probably because you know you’re fighting a losing battle and are mad at the world.
  7. Huh. I don’t know why Israel was granted statehood and exactly how Palestine hasn’t achieved it? Enlighten me. I never said Israel was a beacon of peace.
  8. Well maybe, just maybe if Hamas wasn’t in control, and Gaza could go a few months without firing a rocket, then they could have something similar.
  9. Is it bad? I mean, I’m not advocating provisioning Palestine with an army.
  10. No. God no. Are you insane? I propose they stop firing rockets and committing other terror attacks. Note, this is also the solution to all of their other problems
  11. You’re a moth to the flame. Good luck.
  12. Nah just a good judge of measurements. I guess you’re busying yourself not responding to my post, or perhaps preparing your next out of context post designed to mislead.
  13. Because their leadership are the dumbest savages imaginable and they keep doing barbaric shit.
  14. Israel has had statehood for 76 years and it ain’t going anywhere. Yes, Palestinians could’ve had it dozens of times but have rejected. Are you disputing this? Yes, a WWIII scenario that heavily involves Arab nations’ victory (unlikely) could result in some sort of Palestine but that would never be even a tertiary aim. Good question about Palestine without US support of Israel. UN and European countries are filled with bureaucratic vaginas.
  15. Horseshit. They could’ve had a state dozens of times over the last 75 years but they’ve been meatheadly stupid. Israel is blocking it, for VERY good reason, and we are backing them up. UN may be emboldened but they miss the big picture like the NCAA. They’ll never be granted statehood without a WWIII or a major change in their leadership and general rhetoric. And if they’d been granted statehood decades ago, the same 10/7 shit would’ve happened.
  16. You fail to see the point or are willfully ignoring it. Par for the course.
  17. Huh. Well, maybe Hamas should surrender? No? Then call it whatever you like, war, annilihation, whatever. It’s justified, and there will be collateral damage, particularly with its opponent.
  18. Please name a group whose statehood wasn’t even really on the table because of past atrocities, then commits the worst terror act in their modern history, then gets their ass whipped in a war, which’ll destroy all “leadership” personnel and gets granted statehood by a feeble-minded UN and other countries. It’s absurd. It’s not worth discussion.
  19. Palestine is only interested in killing Jews. Countries from time to time capitulate and you know, do mature country-type things.
  20. You need to retake history, or just fucking watch the news, and stop hanging out with idiot college protestors. I cannot argue with this idiotic equivalency.
  21. They don’t have an answer that won’t make them look foolish. That “Palestine” is going to Little Red Riding Hood itself into statehood after committing an atrocious act and starting all of this shit is fucking so braindead it’s not worth discussion.
  22. Do you realize the irony of you posting this quote? First, I don’t give a shit about the UN. They’re worthless as tits on a boar. Second, I’d like you to explain how a group should react to a group like Hamas and other preceding Palestinian groups that have “a purposeful policy designed to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group (Jews) from certain geographic areas (Israel).” The entire debate staggers the fucking imagination.
  23. Starting to change my mind on you. You’re less like a futureman and more like Fantana.
×
×
  • Create New...