Derka

wemby and sabonis should be higher.

arguing about whether or not xavier worthy has been good for the chiefs in the quinn ewers thread. the goalposts in this thread have been moved so far we are now playing soccer.

syracuse so far this year:

kenpom has us winning 83-73.

i remember when doing my research on RT’s coaching history that his teams historically really only had two things that identified them as being “rodney terry teams”: 1)they don’t defend the three (bad) 2)they don’t turn the ball over (good) so far this team has really exemplified both of these traits: 5th in the country in TO%, 240th defending the three.

seriously. it’s kind of unreal to imagine. if he’d been drafted by a team with any sort of veteran leadership then maybe roy could have reached his potential in the pros. can’t really blame anybody but himself though. still was just a freak at Texas though. helluva downfield blocker. (😡)

im sorry, what? a player’s transition into the nfl determines how good he was in college? on what planet? roy williams, the most dominant WR in Texas history, had 54 and 45 catches respectively his first two seasons. by your logic that means he wasn’t any good at Texas, when in reality he was an absolute monster in college who did not transition well into the nfl for a myriad of reasons. his time in the nfl says absolutely nothing about who he was in college. of all of the asinine arguments made in this thread, this one is the most insane.

what does the nfl have to do with how good our players were at college football? you gonna tell me that charlie ward was “mid” at FSU because he didn’t play in the nfl? get out of here. stop with this asinine argument.