zork

Maybe the intent standard is different for PotUS or spouses of former PotUS'? A deference to the office if you will.

Mueller confirms that in many cases Trump did hire the best people. Those who knew the law or protocols better than him so they did not do as he asked.

CNN is basically saying Congress should move forward because the 10 items are enough to show intent woven together even if the advisors didn't follow through with the requests by the PotUS. Your play now, Pelosi.

in my case: made more, paid less, was simpler due to bigger standard deduction (so 10k limits were offset)and fully utilized both kids as big help in tax reduction. Dotard didn't fuck my household is my conclusion.

FIFY

So the dems are going to start impeachment? What are the markets doing for such questions, @Anastasis?

Barr conflated his remarks in the frame of the "illegal IRA"(Russian research organization) activities that were going on. I interpret that as acknowledgement that there was Russian intent to affect the election but that there was no intent that could be clearly discerned that anyone in the Trump sphere was intentionally colluding with them in a material way. Lots of judgement there but also a ton of resources for two years to get at that conclusion.

no executive priviledge invoked? wikileaks and other hack provided info was considered public since no trump associated hacking? can't collude/obstruct with public information?

guessing: somewhat big house, substantial loan, rising property taxes, kids grown? or is it a humblebrag about an income rise offsetting the tax cut?

🤘

very nice

I like the passion, wood.

Trump Gave Most Americans a Tax Cut and They Didn’t Notice https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-15/trump-gave-most-americans-a-tax-cut-and-they-didn-t-notice

I realize you were being sarcastic. Read the following tweets, by Miami scrimmage attendees, from the original posted and you will see the boos were for FSU fans, not Tate.

Is the reason for not sending the immigrants to sanctuary cities because the feds aren't allowed to release them in non-border areas? Maybe not authorized to pay for them to travel to those cities perhaps? If they are authorized to pay for their travel, seems like there has been many cases where it was paid, it seems like a near Canadien border city like Seattle would be the obvious choice, or the Portland area. Since the sanctuary cities are not willing to work with the federal government on immigration issues then it would be up to those cities to fund their new members of their city by themselves with no federal dollars as well. The feds might actually save money this way with the cost of the bus ride or plane ride deferred in reduction in food/healthcare/detention costs at the border. Win/win/win: feds save money, local communities that are welcoming immigrants get more, immigrants get to be where they are wanted. Just not in LA according to Cher: Cher gets the red pill. edit: Dang, the costs per immigrant from a 2018 report linked are estimated at ~$79k per person by the Feds for the first five years: http://fairus.org/issue/legal-immigration/fiscal-cost-resettling-refugees-united-states They should pay their own way. That is way too expensive.

🤘

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ilhan-omar-isis/ https://www.snopes.com/uploads/2019/01/Yasin-Daud-Ilhan-Omar-letter.pdf Why not be lenient to recruiters to and joiners of ISIS?(ISIL)

What about playing to the strength of the team for say 10% of the plays:(I wanna see Overshown blowing shit up, and not due to injury to any starter) https://247sports.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/Board/105323/Contents/Chargers-Stop-Ravens-by-deploying-SEVEN-DBs-on-98-of-Snaps-127426780/ Clearly when teams go to overloaded OL packages it would likely not work out well.(Okie State game comes to mind)

furk