If the B1G succeeds in luring ND and taking some ACC schools, our schedule would likely have been pretty good had we gone north.
Say it had ended up at 24, with USC, UCLA, ND, us, OU, UNC, UVA, GT, MIA, and Stanford. Or maybe with the star power and pay boost of adding USC, ND, us and OU, they also are able to lure FSU and Clemson instead of MIA and Stan.
We probably end up playing OU and Neb every year, and more from the newcomers than the traditional B10 schools. Thus mostly south and west games. FOX is probably going to go NFL style and have the blue bloods play each other more frequently than a balanced rotation would, so most years we'd play ND, USC, and a Florida school. Ohio St, Mich, and Penn St far more than Purdue or Minnesota.
If USC and UCLA ended up the only PAC additions to the B1G, we'd play them every year. So a yearly game in SoCal and a home slate every year of USC/UCLA, Neb every other year, 1 of Ohio St/Mich/Penn St, 1 of FSU/Clem/ND, and probably 1 of Wisc/UNC on the years we are at Neb. At least 4 good names at home every year.
I'd rather play that schedule, but the travel remains better in the SEC, and more importantly, I don't think the B1G can add enough blue bloods and star programs to eliminate the recruiting advantage of playing in the SEC.
BTW, I've heard on ESPN and seen several of the college reporters on Twitter say this week that the AAU is a factor but not a requirement for the FOXb1g. Hence schools like Mia, Clemson, VT, and maybe FSU would have a shot. This is creating an AFC/NFC now.