So yes, the money and prestige will be worse, and probably affect other sports, but for football would Tech and other schools actually be better off if the superconference(s) formed now and the left behinds started their own playoffs? Some of the rumors are that the one or two superconferences will when formed split off from the NCAA and have a separate playoff. Ok, bummer at not being in the big boy 40 and their most prestigious playoffs. But now Tech and the other IR8 go from almost zero chance of making a playoff to a good chance some/most years. Probably 16 spots for less than 90 teams, and likely 16 for less than 50 with a real shot.
Ultimately would you rather be an almost always left out hanger on in the P4 just hoping to make the Piss Ant Bowl, or a major player in the next division that still is on TV every week and probably makes the playoffs at least every three years? Would the AAC be so bad if several of their teams were in the G Leagues playoff every year, with every post-season game on TV? ESPN would probably replace a lot (all?) of the bowls with playoffs if the artist formerly known as FBS was split into 2 divisions with 2 playoffs. And probably 16 schools for the non-superconference division, because why not?
The 'Every game in the regular season should matter!' crowd may crap their Depends, but most of us would probably enjoy it. 2 sets of playoffs is better than 1 set and bowls. And there's rumors that FBS might be split into 3 divisions and 3 playoffs.
How many schools in the lower divisions of Texas HS football wish there was only 1 set of playoffs for all of HS football?