Vegas had OU, sharps had us, dunno how public went. It's at least a game we weren't the clear favorites in.
Vanderbilt was actually another one that split as Vegas and sharps had us, but the public money went on Vanderbilt.
That would be out of Georgia's element. They run to set up numbers for screen passes. Don't dropback a whole lot, I think they are last in the SEC in air-yards.
Aggy has the better resume in pure W-L.
Indiana was looking unstoppable until last week, while aggy looks pretty stoppable. I'd go IU -> tOSU -> aggy, but there's arguments for whichever way. I don't think the CFP changes what they have without a pretty compelling reason.
Gen Z also actually owns homes at a higher rate than Gen X or Millennials did at the same age. They took advantage of a deflated covid market and they are also inheriting homes at a much larger tick (presumably left by boomer grandparents).
There' still some OOC and bowl games left, but the SEC is on schedule for the best year for a conference since the Big 8 in the 80s. I think some of it has to do with NIL evening the field (in the SEC at least) but also all the P4 "minor" teams lost their covid super-seniors (except Pavia) and have holes unfilled from the covid fallout.
There would be decent brands in both the upper two divisions, though. The middle one would be about half P4 teams and likely have some struggling big brands like Nebraska and UCLA. And fans would really care if you were playing for advancement.
Alternatively, they would care/dread if you were in the upper league and playing for relegation. The system makes both ends of the divisions have meaning.
But the best feature is that there is incentive to win in the lower leagues and to not suck in the upper ones.