It seems to be adult trafficking, so congrats that I was technically wrong on an insignificant detail. As you also are in the sentence above, but I don't need your apology.
The effect of the supreme court ruling (besides changing words used) was basically to ask the lower court to better clarify what it wants. Which the lower court can't do effectively because anything it actually commands, so-to-speak, will get overturned. So everyone is now playing a game of last liar.
What do you think the SCOTUS ruling did?
Changes:
The idea that it was a manufactured case for political reasons is from the Boasberg one. I still think that one is. But this one definitely wasn't his lawyers fault or deliberate nor the judge's (although giving on simple thing like the deadlines would be helpful.)
Things that haven't changed:
This was an Executive error.
Trump is resisting the court order or at least maliciously compliant while he is farming it for support.
It's a losing fight de facto (best result is he's released from prison and joins his family in El Salvador, but he's not coming back in any meaningful way.)
It's not any sort of case to have a constitutional crisis over.
It's at the bottom of last page, but I said I was combining the two cases in my head.
What's funny is it took two pages from someone to even notice without simply slinging an insult.
Higher bar to clear, but a worse status. It's more like TPS, immigration proceedings can continue, but the hold prevents certain orders from being actionable. It's literally immigration limbo and is a bad system.
I actually am as multiple discussions are going on simultaneously. He was in El Salvador already when the case was filed and it actually is habeas. This is more like the Quintero Chacon case.
This was kind of the point of my original post. This specific case is actually stupid all around. Democrats want it to look outrageous, Trump wants Democrats to look crazy. Both have been successful depending on what echo chamber you step into.
Someome show me where his lawyers alleged there was no notice. I've seen this said multiple times. His lawyers certainly knew to file this case while he was being moved.
I agree. I believe deporting someone under the A/S Act would actually take immigration courts out of the picture, but I'm not sure it should apply to current orders. That's ultimately what this actual case is about, right?
I believe it was on purpose. They likely couldn't proceed with this case because the habeas case would happen first. If Abrego wasn't aware of this, his lawyers should be the ones in the Salvadorian prison.
I'm aware of all this. I'm not the one here spreading misinfo about habeas whack-a-mole and his deportation status.
Since people are logging alts to neg me, I'll leave this "shithole" again. I'd love if y'all considered these two things:
1) This is actually the dumbest possible potential constitutional crisis. Mostly due to politics on both sides being more important than legal procedure.
2) There was an actual solution to this. Abrego could very easily not be deported right now and he could actually be having the trial everyone thinks he should be having (and that's due to Trump and not really due to the judge either - not his responsibility but he definitely should have told the lawyers to also file for habeas, it was clear in their original filing that they intended to).
I'm not disagreeing. His lawyers should have filed habeas and they could actually argue that and halt his deportation at the same time.
Why do you suppose they chose not to? Incompetence?