Things to talk about at the watercooler:
Follow ups from last week:
Colorado may actually be good.
Tech and Baylor lost again, but played tough games against Oregon and Utah, who should both be good this year. Throw these two teams in the "need more information" pile.
Illinois is probably actually bad. They lost to Kansas, who isn't terrible this year, but it was a convincing win. Iowa won El Assico 20-13. Still doesn't look like their year. Nebraska lost to Colorado, and Minnesota has a not very impressive 25-6 over Eastern Michigan. It's now a trend: the west division of the B1G is terrible.
Oklahoma came back down to earth a bit against a team with somewhat of a pulse, 28-11 over SMU.
Washington had a serviceable win over Tulsa. Call me a believer now for their top 10 spot.
I'm putting UCF back on ignore after a plodding win over Boise State. They may be better than expected, but not attention-worthy.
Week 2 Games and Thoughts:
Texas rolls Tide
Enough has been said, so quick question to ponder. Did any position group for Bama look better than any position group for Texas?
Tennessee over Austin Peay 30-13
I can't tell you where Austin Peay even is, but I assume that being 0-1 in FCS is a bad thing.
Wazzou over Wisconsin, 31-22
When trying to figure out which conferences actually play better ball in 2 months, this battle of lowbies was both surprising and convincing.
There really weren't many other surprising upsets or wins this week. Pretty much everyone else in the state of Texas lost, but the only unexpected one was Rice over UH.
Other Trends:
USC's three games have an average score of 59 - 17. USC is back?
Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State are on autopilot. I'm not sure if that's a compliment or not right now. The rest of their league is going to be terrible. Throw Georgia in this camp as well, they won't play a ranked game until November, if those teams are even still ranked.