Everything posted by JBJ
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Why play two when you can play 1?
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
In fact, 1-4 didn't win a single game.
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
If true, it's not just evidence that this committee is dumb, this is plain corruption.
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Oregon JMU spread is going wild.
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Which of those games should I watch to convince me ND is a playoff team?
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Would we be favored over all the first-round teams? Oregon, maybe not?
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
We already seen this game this year and they didn't.
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Miami has a run defense.
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
They ended up putting the two that have the worst losses in. Florida doesn't matter.
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Drumrolll......
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Psychology of colors is messing with the eye test.
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Georgia at 3 is a surprise.
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
Bama in is apparently already leaked.
-
Holy shit you dipshits: 9-3 Texas is probably in the playoffs
Neither team has a game that you can tell a friend to go watch to show that they are a top 10 team.
-
2025-26 CFP General Discussion
Yes. All BCS models did. You could only consider W-L, no scores and no stats, which just isn't enough.
-
2025-26 CFP General Discussion
They either need to give the committee a stricter structure or just use computer models. The weekly rankings are supposed to give a good sense of where you stand, but they've moved idle teams and teams without a notable outcome in pretty much every week this year. No matter whether you think we are done or not, we are open in sportsbooks, which means enough people think idle Texas could be swapped with another idle team that it is a betting prop. The big issue with computer models is that it is really hard to exclude "run up the score" stats in them and have good output. And most modelers don't really understand football. They just have generic modified Elo's or stat regression's that they could apply to any sport or game. These aren't bad, but they aren't good either. We all see the headscratchers that Sagarin puts out at times. And his BCS-qualified model was even worse.
-
Holy shit you dipshits: 9-3 Texas is probably in the playoffs
The team that deserved the spot more wasn't talked about at all though (Ole Miss).
-
2025 CFB Polls/Rankings Thead
One hour away
-
Holy shit you dipshits: 9-3 Texas is probably in the playoffs
If the committee want to be consistent, it is either Bama and Texas or Notre Dame and Vandy. SOR and elite wins vs handling business and good losses. I realize that consistency is not a requirement.
-
Arch Manning: Scores every way possible
I had a nightmare that we've seen Arch play his last game in a Texas uniform.
-
Holy shit you dipshits: 9-3 Texas is probably in the playoffs
Good catch USC was by 10. I think the point still stands, but USC is a bit better than Pitt.
-
Holy shit you dipshits: 9-3 Texas is probably in the playoffs
Notre Dame beat Pitt by 10 points in the last relevant game of their year. Texas beat aggy by 10 in our last game. One is clearly better than other.
-
Holy shit you dipshits: 9-3 Texas is probably in the playoffs
Now do the other bubble teams, lol.
-
Holy shit you dipshits: 9-3 Texas is probably in the playoffs
In every metric the CFP is supposed to look at: SOR: Texas > Bama > Notre Dame > Miami SOS: Texas > Bama > Notre Dame > Miami Quality of losses: Notre Dame > Texas > Bama > Miami Quality of wins: Texas > Bama > Miami > Notre Dame
-
Holy shit you dipshits: 9-3 Texas is probably in the playoffs
North of 285, so I'm solidly suburbia. If the CCGs don't matter, they become irrelevant.