Jump to content

52-80

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    17564
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

19402 Surly 1%

1 Follower

Titles

  • Title
    code duello

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The article says “all elements must be confirmed”. The element that WR was defenseless was satisfied. The one where the tacklers ‘purpose’ was to make contact with the helmet was not. Helmet was incidental contact during a bonafide tackle. (Probably why they call it a targeting penalty and not a helmet penalty)
  2. This is the 2023 NCAA Rulebook https://taso.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2023-NCAA-Football-Rule-Book.pdf There's also a section on Targeting, and why it wasnt called on Taaffe. He didnt intend to attack with the helmet. He was going for a standard tackle with his arms in the wrap motion milliseconds after the helmets collided.
  3. big props to @immamac for the steamy links also lol trying to tag him here:
  4. if they survive this, next game quinn will have to win a shootout against buckeyes or ducks. lmao.
  5. if you actually break down the play and diagram over a youtube snapshot, it was actually a perfect throw and quinn ewers is the best tosser in the world.
×
×
  • Create New...