Jump to content

Lolathon

New Members
  • Posts

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

16 Good

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Just read the scouting and pay attention to the adjectives. They're paid for a reason, and despite what people may believe, get the physicals right close to 100% of the time One of these players is a tweener/project, which means limited upside given they were already highly developed coming out of Westlake. The other has elite traits that translate to the NFL level. Vasek's injury issues are likely the result of his frame just not being able to hold up at the position his skillset was best suited beyond the HS level, muscle mass doesn't change skeletal structure
  2. A true freshman that's rated #1 at his position in the country? How did Simmons do last year
  3. These guys don't really play the same position fyi. Burke/Vasek/Jackson are primarily run stoppers first, traditional 5 techs strong enough to fight off tackles/TE's to set the edge while having the ability to stand up. Moore is the true hybrid. Simmons is a pass rush specialist, but that likely changes as he gets stronger over time. Vasek really wouldn't have had much of a role this year with Jackson(if he's as good as scouting says) enrolling early and Burke still around
  4. Fans loved major because it was a cute underdog story, which they related to. Simms was 100% the better qb, and has ironically been revealed to be the better person as well post playing career
  5. This is such a biased, garbage take. Cam Newton did everything better than Vince. Everything.
  6. Because these are their returning starters WR1 WR3 RG FS They might also get back off WLB1 and CB2, aside from that everyone is gone. And they'll be starting a true sophomore at QB with 12 career pass attempts
  7. If you mean Shaw and Brevard, those were the 2 I was talking about. Shaw was a blue chip that hasn't developed well, issue could have been Mack's staff/scheme so potential may still be there. And Brevard is a 0/1 tech, so he won't be an every down player. Only other returning player is January. Bo Davis really fucked up interior DL recruiting in 2022 & 2023, amazing how Baker came in and immediately pulled the best class in the country
  8. DT/NT is the biggest question mark. Relying on 2 transfers, neither of whom were great at Purdue/UNC, will likely be a big step back from the last 3 years. The incoming freshman class will be elite down the line, but will need at least a year for S&C before being SEC ready.
  9. He's a 10.8 100 guy and could be an absolute matchup nightmare at TE. Also his frame projects more as a TE than WR imo, already weighed ~220 in high school. And there too much WR depth already between Wingo, Niblett, Moore, Butler, Lockett, Ffrench and McCutcheon. I'd be shocked if Terry didn't end up a TE or WLB ala Lefau
  10. 21st in 2015 1st in 2016 15th in 2017 with Sark running Shanahan’s playbook 10th in 2018 using his own
  11. And the Falcons were 2 yards away from beating the Eagles in the Dvisional in 2017, Sarks 1st year. Eagles blew out the Vikings in the NFC CG and went on to win the SB
  12. Looking back on it, what the fuck was Dan Quinn thinking firing Sark? If they score on the last play from the Eagles 2 yard line, they probably win the Super Bowl in Sark's 1st year as OC. And then the offense actually improved in year 2..who the hell fires an OC with a top 10 offense?
  13. Terry might be the answer at TE, but he'll need to gain 15-20 lbs in the next 8 months. Also moving away from TE and using 4 WR sets might be the plan, would make sense with how crowded the WR room is
×
×
  • Create New...