there are others out there, the technology is going to have to be turbo charged, like I said. but understand there are hardly any DAC facilities out there. so 100 times bigger doesn't mean big. we went from horse drawn carriages to rocket ships taking us to the moon. we can do this. we just don't want to do this.
here's another article on it.
https://www.spglobal.com/commodity-insights/en/news-research/latest-news/energy-transition/050824-worlds-largest-direct-air-capture-plant-enters-operation-in-iceland
2023 we released 37 billion MT of CO2 from fossil fuels. yay us!
again though if we convert to nuclear as the primary energy source, augment with solar/wind and batteries, continue the shift to EVs then a serious dent in emissions could be achieved. add rapid development and deployment of DAC and a few other initiatives and we could hold the line I think. but nah, increased profit now is better than sustainable profit later!