Jump to content

crossblue82

New Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by crossblue82

  1. Many here have related how important it may be to have one of the top one or two 1 seeds relative to just merely being a 1 seed. It’s starting to look like only Texas OR South Carolina could do that. Makes you wonder if the potential SEC tourney final rubber type match would be for this distinction. Seems that it could really play out that way. I think for sure you don’t want UConn as your 2, probably not ND but then you have to see that you really may not want NC State as your 2 either…. Lots to move here and see how those dominoes fall. As of now whether that is LSU, UNC, TCU whoever I think that’s who you want as your 2 and not from the former group of teams I mentioned.
  2. Why is UConn #1 in NET? And weren’t they that high even before the lopsided win at South Carolina? I really don’t get it. I’m not saying they aren’t one of the best teams and a natty favorite, but that ranking juxtaposed with scheduled and results is really bothering me. 4 Quad 1 wins up against 12 Quad 1 wins for both South Carolina and Texas underneath them? This is also intriguing as it relates to seeding. Crème once said NET #1 has never been on the top line, but I think most agree now that the four 1’s should be Texas, both USC’s and UCLA. Notre Dame may well be out of it now. I think UConn is the only one who can somehow steal one from one of these teams. I would think if Texas beats Florida and secures a tie for the SEC they would secure their #1 but I still have pause because of the UConn situation.
  3. Longtime lurker and first time posting here. Used to post on Shaggy - not sure I’ve ever posted on Surly, anyway… I am by no means jumping on the wagon as I follow all UT sports, but seeing as how I haven’t been fully engaged all season for the ladies it wasn’t until a few days ago I realized we were down A-Mo, then after wondering how Phelia was doing I noticed she wasn’t in the box scores for several games, etc. then came to realize what happened to her. Injuries stink but are a part of the game, just frustrating how many times it happens when you have a natty worthy team. Here’s what I am wondering - obviously I’ve witnessed how good we can be as I have been watching recently the stretch of several ranked wins, etc. Is a spade a spade and does their absence hurt us and our chances moving forward or is it possible that it has revealed some great things with younger players as they have been forced into larger roles? Again, I haven’t watched enough or learned enough about the newer contributing players to discern this. Can someone kind of take me through that?
×
×
  • Create New...