4th and 5

Looks like capital murder to me

I still have 3 All Star Shrimp Tail specials. And a few All Star Titaniums. Damn fine roods.

Arc Angels twice this week in NB and ATX

If only this thread were to draw a bead on getting nudes of that fine ass Persian.....

he could have bought like a dozen Rugers for that night on the town

I don’t own a leaf blower. I own three.

Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property: (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary: (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and (3) he reasonably believes that: (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury. yeah, it was not theft during the night time..... HOWEVER IT COULD BE ARUGUED THAT HE WAS COMMITTING A BURGLARY (T.P.C 30.02) as he, without the effective consent of the owner, entered a portion of a building not then open to the public, with intent to commit a felony, theft, or an assault. Behind the counter, employees only, stock rooms, etc., are portions of a building not then open to the public and would constitute a burglary Note that could bring into play this section of the Penal Code Sec. 9.05. RECKLESS INJURY OF INNOCENT THIRD PERSON. Even though an actor is justified under this chapter in threatening or using force or deadly force against another, if in doing so he also recklessly injures or kills an innocent third person, the justification afforded by this chapter is unavailable in a prosecution for the reckless injury or killing of the innocent third person.

cash under the table hookers and cocaine

Your hot.

Snakes are thick on the Pennisula for sure. Crossing over to surf or surf fish is an adventure and they rarely rattle. Hogs are some swimming bastards they haul ass. Deer too. I once saw an 8 point buck crossing by the cost guard station and he was moving even with those skinny ass legs. I saw a bobcat swim across army cut and he looked less than majestic when got to land. Pathetic looking and annoyed. I ran over 2 deer swimming the cut coming out of Pringle, got the boat out of gear but there was no way to stop

If you are a criminal defendant, the last person you want prosecuting you is Lisa Tanner

User name checks out

case dismissed against Baldwin, but not the armorer

If the case was indicted within the applicable statute of limitations that existed at the time of the alleged offense.

that's a tenancy in common, sir

Use SLUGGO PLUS and they’ll be gone

Miracle Gro once a week You need to plant bigger tomatoes much sooner. Once the lows are in the upper 70s-80s the flowers wont set fruit. You’ll have to hope for a cool June. Suggestion for next year. In February Buy tomatoes in 6 or 9 packs (cheap) then up pot them in DEEP plastic 4 inch pots (not easy to find), keep them in trays to be able bring in on cold nights. Use Miracle Gro for tomatoes frequently. You can use a dilute solution almost daily. Around March 10th, go for it. Plant deep in the ground with a little compost and slow release fertilizer. The pic above is 2 nine packs @$6.99 Lowes, got lucky, not a fan of their prices 9 singles @$1.49 HEB huge fan of their veggies and prices 3 tomatoes are from last year! See post on previous page, cut back and growing again $9 for seed potatoes

Herb

Twelve days later

if it's not a 10/22 or Mark series pistol, I don't want it

IN A ROW??

how is Dan Snyder not a defendant??

D not testifying is the general rule, but in a self defense case, in many cases the D has to. I've put my client on the stand before for self defense (NG) His earlier statement seemed to not justify self defense, which would need to be cleaned up. Of course, cross would be ugly, given his social media / phone data. A little to gain and perhaps a lot to lose. I don't second guess his lawyers, they are good. If I was the prosecutor, I would have hoped he did testify. Lots of ammo for cross.