Jump to content

Texas Recruiting Notes 2020

Reese Bennett

By Reese Bennett
in 🤫$9.95🤫

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Machinator

    3246

  • texifornia

    2658

  • Elmer_Fudd

    1323

  • Fud

    1204

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Boerne Horn
Boerne Horn
truthbringerlrac
truthbringerlrac

just tired of losing recruits to colleges oozing with beautiful thots while ut only has nerdy awkward thots to present to recruits........fun fact malik jefferson was getting clowned on ig by other re

Txsbigeasy1
Txsbigeasy1

for you anything!  

Posted Images

XOVERX

XOVERX 5

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

 

It was Eagles and I think it was, “I ain’t goin to no damn TCU!”

That's a classic recruiting line from Brennan Eagles, lol, and it bears recalling from time-to-time.

It puts me in mind of Super Bill Bradley's comment when asked at the coin flip in the '68 Texas v. aggy game to call heads or tails and Bradley said, "It don't make a shit", lol.

What's not so funny about the Bradley line is that I remember when he made that comment, lol 😂.

Edited by XOVERX
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bluto

bluto 4916

Posted
Posted
That's a classic recruiting line from Brennan Eagles, lol, and it bears recalling from time-to-time.
It puts me in mind of Super Bill Bradley's comment when asked at the coin flip in the '68 Texas v. aggy game to call heads or tails and Bradley said, "It don't make a shit", lol.
What's not so funny about the Bradley line is that I remember when he made that comment, lol .


Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Burt Macklin

Burt Macklin 19020

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

My guess is there's a transfer LB that we have interest in but just hasn't happened yet like the RB from Clemson. 

Hopefully. A grad transfer or JUCO LB would be huge for the 2020 season.  This roster is pretty deep this year, but will have even fewer holes next year. LB is the most obvious one while we're looking at it one year out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16576

Posted
Posted
Nice to see us back on the right trend

Washington and Penn State doing good things. UCLA... yikes [mention=1357]Sbbruin[/mention]

EBcz-5vXkAAAPta?format=jpg&name=small

 

It's incredible that USC went 5-7 in a garbage Pac 12 last year. Just eyballing it, they've got to be #4 or #5 in four-year rolling blue chip ratio.

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Burt Macklin

Burt Macklin 19020

Posted
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, texifornia said:

Nice to see us back on the right trend

Washington and Penn State doing good things. UCLA... yikes @Sbbruin

EBcz-5vXkAAAPta?format=jpg&name=small

Always a good chart to look at.

This takes into account the entire roster, right? Does it look just at each class on NSD, or does it factor in attrition? If it includes attrition, we’ll be spiking way up next year too (subbing out the 16 class that has a poor ratio after attrition for 2020). If not, we’ll still go up but not by quite as much. Either way, we’re going to be solidly on the top 5 for the foreseeable future.

This chart also evidences what I was saying about aggy last week. Jimbo’s classes will be highly rated becuase he’s taking like 27 per year, but he’s not actually improving their blue chip ratio all that much. He also seems to land a few guys who are technically 4 stars but outside the top 300 every year. 

Clemson will take a pretty huge jump next year when they sub out the 16 class for 20. 

Edited by Burt Macklin
Link to comment
Share on other sites
texifornia

texifornia 56907

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Burt Macklin said:

Always a good to see.

This takes into account the entire roster, right? Does it look just at each class on MSD, or does it factor in attrition? If it includes attrition, we’ll be spiking way up next year too (subbing out the 16 class that has a poor ratio after attrition for 2020). If not, we’ll still go up but not by quite as much. Either way, we’re going to be solidly on the top 5 for the foreseeable future.

This chart also evidences what I was saying about aggy last week. Jimbo’s classes will be highly rated becuase he’s taking like 27 per year, but he’s not actually improving their blue chip ratio all that much. He also seems to land a few guys who are technically 4 stars but outside the top 300 every year. 

Clemson will take a pretty huge jump next year when they sub out the 16 class for 20. 

The methodology is in here from last year (this year's article is only on the Banner Society's newsletter): https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/college-football/2018/8/22/17606048/blue-chip-ratio-2018

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Burt Macklin

Burt Macklin 19020

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, texifornia said:

The methodology is in here from last year (this year's article is only on the Banner Society's newsletter): https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/college-football/2018/8/22/17606048/blue-chip-ratio-2018

Got it. Looks like he just goes off signing classes without factoring in attrition. Can’t say I blame him. It would be a very time consuming undertaking to track each roster and compile all the data accounting for each year’s attrition/transfers.

We won’t jump up as much next year, since on NSD 2016 (17:11), however 2020 will likely be higher. The real big jump for us in this metric will be going from the 17 class (6:12) to the 2021 class (likely something around the 19:8 ratio we had in 18). From there on out, we’ll be at or above that 68% line that only 3 schools are above right now.

In other words, our talent will indicate we should be a playoff team year in and year out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Walden Ponderer

Walden Ponderer 12639

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

Jimbo’s classes will be highly rated becuase he’s taking like 27 per year, but he’s not actually improving their blue chip ratio all that much. He also seems to land a few guys who are technically 4 stars but outside the top 300 every year. 

Take a look at Jimbo's FSU classes, and try reconciling it with his performance as a head coach. Apart from one year where Charlie Strong did less with more, nobody has done less with more. And now, he's coaching somewhere where he doesn't even have more.

Preview5.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...