Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Parliament said:

I call BS.

Why?  007 isn't James Bond.  007 is a designation.  So Bond retires and they give the 007 designation to the woke chick.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

That article seems to say that the actress is gorgeous and that bond can’t resist her character. But the picture is of a decently attractive woman. 

She's attractive at best. She's a bit mannish looking IMO.

  • Like 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

That article seems to say that the actress is gorgeous and that bond can’t resist her character. But the picture is of a decently attractive woman. 

For those that have seen it, she's Larson's best friend in Captain Marvel.

 

Posted

The only way to save the franchise is to clone Sean Connery. It should be old enough to take on the role of young Bond by the time the sting wears off this shitfest.

Posted
Just now, RPM said:

The only way to save the franchise is to clone Sean Connery. It should be old enough to take on the role of young Bond by the time the sting wears off this shitfest.

He was the best IMO, but I really dig Craigs darker more mercurial portrayal as well.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Reads like she has the 007 designation but then James Bond is called back into service from retirement.  In other words, no big deal.  More of a stunt to generate buzz.

Edited by Nice Guy Eddie
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, longhornmatt said:

The movie ends with James Bond getting taken to the cleaners when Moneypenny finally sues for sexual harassment.

Nope. He fakes his death and bails out to avoid a multitude of paternity suits

Posted
21 hours ago, mdmost said:

I wished they'd gotten Brie Larson just watch everyone's heads explode. What's the male equivalent of clutching pearls?

Brie seems to be making a play for Star Wars. I really hope they make her the supreme Jedi or something like that. It would be fitting.

Posted
On 7/14/2019 at 10:55 AM, Onboard 2.0 said:

She's attractive at best. She's a bit mannish looking IMO.

She's like a slightly sexier version of Keenan Thompson.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, ajax said:

She's like a slightly sexier version of Keenan Thompson.

I wouldn't go that far, but can see the resemblance. She damn isn't striking in her looks, and is a little on the plumper side for sure (movie star plump, not normal person plump).

Posted
24 minutes ago, ajax said:

She's like a slightly sexier version of Keenan Thompson.

No doubt the movie industry can do some magic and make people almost unrecognizable at times, but from the picture in the link, I can see "mannish" as described above.  Maybe it's the hair a bit, but she seems like a person that if you dressed her a certain way, you could pull off "that's a man!"  Suspect there'll be another "Bond girl" in the movie that is more in line with purist expectations.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, Lhorn said:

No doubt the movie industry can do some magic and make people almost unrecognizable at times, but from the picture in the link, I can see "mannish" as described above.  Maybe it's the hair a bit, but she seems like a person that if you dressed her a certain way, you could pull off "that's a man!"  Suspect there'll be another "Bond girl" in the movie that is more in line with purist expectations.  

Maybe it's the Eugene Levy eyebrows.

Posted

I can see a female "Double 0" agent. Maybe even a stand alone movie about a female "Double 0" agent. I might not watch it, but I wouldn't have a problem with it.

But if they try to have a Jane Bond 007, that would be a woke trainwreck and would ruin the longest running movie franchise.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, gecko said:

Were movie-goers clamoring for Bond movies to "get with the times"?  Answer probably..."no".  Dumbass Hollywood...

Here are two paths:

A) You make a great movie that makes a ton of money. Use the money to buy a huge mansion, fancy cars, and beautiful women. Hollywood notices you with your beautiful women and fancy cars and pours out love to you.

B) You make a shity ass woke movie that loses a fuckton of money, but Hollywood pours out love to you because of your wokeness.

When you think about it, path B makes more sense and is faster than path A if you're a narcissist.

Posted

I don’t think it’s fair to judge who like brown sugar based on that chick. I’m sure she has a rocking bod or she wouldn’t be considered for the part. Facewise, she not exactly great. It’s also important to remember this is Surly. We pass on 7s.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
17 hours ago, Drew said:

You can tell the posters that don't like Dark womenz... Men

I think Kenan Thompson is funny as hell, I just think playing Bond is a stretch for him.spacer.png

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On ‎7‎/‎17‎/‎2019 at 5:29 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

Nah not really. She just isn't that beautiful. She's pretty, but not Bond girl hot.

She wouldn't be a Bond "Girl" in this scenario.

 

And jesus Frank Erwin, she doesn't look like a dude.  But I do see a lot of Surly members who seem to always say the black woman we post are really dudes(except for like Halle Berry and similar toned women).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...