Jump to content

Alex Jones

Hornius Emeritus

By Hornius Emeritus
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

elguapo
elguapo
Gil Bang
Gil Bang

oh shit      

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

A large, disgusting receptacle filled with smelly rancid shit.  Also pictured, a porta potty.  

Posted Images

TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31450

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

Good. Fucking. Question.

Since she's been hounding Reynal about it all trial, from what I've seen, I guess it's another example of Gamble pulling her punches.  Admonishing him about his closing would be strong stuff.

Maybe a better question is why the plaintiffs aren't objecting.

But I also imagine that the jury will be strongly instructed not to consider any evidence or argument that Jones isn't liable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29905

Posted
Posted

Did anyone make note of Jones starting to rise from his chair when the plaintiff lawyer directly addressed his speech to Jones? Jones' lawyers put hands on his shoulders to warn him not to move against the other lawyer.

Another detail about Jones' memory: I think he used to claim that he had a photographic memory never forgets anything. I wonder if that could have been played while he was on the stand. I don't even know if there are copies from so long ago.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27214

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, HenryJames said:

First they came for the before picture, and said nothing because fuck him. Then they came for the after picture, and I said nothing because it’s the same as the before picture.

image.thumb.jpeg.16568864e7173f82d10c3089a2b9b721.jpeg

That's 45 pounds difference?!?! Uh, no ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blotto

Blotto 23497

Posted
Posted

I dont shit about fuck when it comes to law, but what am I watching here? When the defense kicked off his last presentation, he seemed to imply there were two phases to this trial, and this was only the first. And then at the closing, he said he looked forward to when he would present again on the matter of punitive damages. What is the jury deciding now then? 

2 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

Did anyone make note of Jones starting to rise from his chair when the plaintiff lawyer directly addressed his speech to Jones? Jones' lawyers put hands on his shoulders to warn him not to move against the other lawyer.

Another detail about Jones' memory: I think he used to claim that he had a photographic memory never forgets anything. I wonder if that could have been played while he was on the stand. I don't even know if there are copies from so long ago.

I did see that. I was hoping for a Colonel Jessup moment from Jones. My guess is Jones, like most bullies, is in reality an insecure pussy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sawbonz

Sawbonz 27547

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

First they came for the before picture, and I said nothing because fuck him. Then they came for the after picture, and I still said nothing because it’s the same as the before picture.

image.thumb.jpeg.16568864e7173f82d10c3089a2b9b721.jpeg

Ad for spray tanner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 19078

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

First they came for the before picture, and I said nothing because fuck him. Then they came for the after picture, and I still said nothing because it’s the same as the before picture.

image.thumb.jpeg.16568864e7173f82d10c3089a2b9b721.jpeg

Preheat oven to 350 degrees. Bake for 15 minutes.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27654

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Blotto said:

I dont shit about fuck when it comes to law, but what am I watching here? When the defense kicked off his last presentation, he seemed to imply there were two phases to this trial, and this was only the first. And then at the closing, he said he looked forward to when he would present again on the matter of punitive damages. What is the jury deciding now then? 

I think this first trial is for compensatory damages, and then another for punative damages as additional punishment for fuckery

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrickHorn

BrickHorn 18218

Posted
Posted

I’m not thrilled with the plaintiff’s closing. The themes were not very tight. I would like them to have explained that Jones hurt these people by smearing them, damaging their reputation, causing a sizable portion of the American public to believe they were liars at best and witting accomplices in some tyrannical conspiracy at worst. I wasn’t fully tuned in but it seemed like they just kind of relied in the idea that Jones said mean things that hurt their feelings. Which lent power to Reynal’s otherwise unimportant point that the parents did not even listen to Jones’s show.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27214

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Apparently they're pushing the idea that the whole trial is scripted.

 

There is a whole lot of "you're out of your fucking element, Donny" or simple, outright stupid in that Twitter stream

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9865

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

wow. had I cooked up 1000 scenarios of what they might find on that dipshit's phone I honestly did not have child porn anywhere on my radar. oh well, hope he ends up in PMITA prison and his cellmate can play dress up with him

It's a deep state false flag

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45899

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

wow. had I cooked up 1000 scenarios of what they might find on that dipshit's phone I honestly did not have child porn anywhere on my radar. oh well, hope he ends up in PMITA prison and his cellmate can play dress up with him

Good God, man, I know it's prison, but that's the definition of cruel and unusual punishment . . . for the cellmate.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27214

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

wow. had I cooked up 1000 scenarios of what they might find on that dipshit's phone I honestly did not have child porn anywhere on my radar. oh well, hope he ends up in PMITA prison and his cellmate can play dress up with him

That's a 3-year-old news story or am I missing something? AJ's attorney accidentally shared the contents of AJ's phone with plaintiff attorneys 12 days ago. There's no report of child porn on AJ's phone at this time.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captainant

Captainant 27654

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, C-Man said:

That's a 3-year-old news story or am I missing something? AJ's attorney accidentally shared the contents of AJ's phone with plaintiff attorneys 12 days ago. There's no report of child porn on AJ's phone at this time.

You're correct. The child porn was returned by free speech systems and jones during one of the abortive discovery attempts in 2019. IMO, I think Jones' phone will be a bigger factor towards his Jan6 jeopardy, considering he took da fif a couple hundred times 

 

Edited by Captainant
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8712

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, TXSG8R said:

So what happens with the perjury stuff? Does the judge wait until after the trial is done to level any punishment for that?  Does that require some separate hearing(s)? 

A judge could hold someone in contempt but perjury will require a prosecutor to bring the charges in a separate criminal case 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chopper

Chopper 17230

Posted
Posted

As I understand it - Per Texas rules of the court, the plaintiff's attorney, upon discovering material he believed to be privileged, was required to notify the defendant's attorney that he had material that appeared to be privileged and then wait 10 days for the defendant's attorney to respond. In those 10 days he was unable to read the material let alone use it for any purpose. There was apparently no response from Jones' attorney within the 10 days set out in the rules, so the defendant's privilege was waived, and the plaintiff's attorney was able to read and use the information at trial. I read that gave him less than a day to read as much as he was able to, and try to synthesize it for use at the trial. The attorney can't release the info to the public but he can and should be able to share it in response to legit requests or situations, in keeping with his professional legal responsibilities and ethics. So if he finds evidence of criminal behavior, evidence of perjury, or the like, he can refer it to legal authorities. Other parties are free to try to subpoena it, including the j6 committee, or other Sandy Hook plaintiffs...or perhaps even his exwife if she thinks he lied in court about his ability to pay alimony.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31450

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, TXSG8R said:

So what happens with the perjury stuff? Does the judge wait until after the trial is done to level any punishment for that?  Does that require some separate hearing(s)? 

A district attorney will have to indict him, if they go forward with it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TXSG8R

TXSG8R 3362

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

A judge could hold someone in contempt but perjury will require a prosecutor to bring the charges in a separate criminal case 

Which is more common?  I’m sure the judge would like a piece of his ass for all the shit he’s caused her, but she is probably also leery of anything appearing personal based on the liability judgement?  Is perjury one of those “juice isn’t worth the squeeze” court things where prosecutors/courts are loath to waste resources on?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31450

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chopper said:

As I understand it - Per Texas rules of the court, the plaintiff's attorney, upon discovering material he believed to be privileged, was required to notify the defendant's attorney that he had material that appeared to be privileged and then wait 10 days for the defendant's attorney to respond. In those 10 days he was unable to read the material let alone use it for any purpose. There was apparently no response from Jones' attorney within the 10 days set out in the rules, so the defendant's privilege was waived, and the plaintiff's attorney was able to read and use the information at trial. I read that gave him less than a day to read as much as he was able to, and try to synthesize it for use at the trial. The attorney can't release the info to the public but he can and should be able to share it in response to legit requests or situations, in keeping with his professional legal responsibilities and ethics. So if he finds evidence of criminal behavior, evidence of perjury, or the like, he can refer it to legal authorities. Other parties are free to try to subpoena it, including the j6 committee, or other Sandy Hook plaintiffs...or perhaps even his exwife if she thinks he lied in court about his ability to pay alimony.

Ah, good find on the inadvertent waiver.  It's in Rule 193.3.  I didn't realize Texas had a rule directed toward it.  Federal courts do not.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...