Alex Jones

[Underdog 29176]

14 hours ago, Bullneck said:

Keep it up. You're mom's friends will be very impressed with you.

One of my favorite categorieson pornhub. 

 

 

Edited October 2, 2021 by Underdog

[Gatorubet 30713]

Perfect.  That's a great example of why we can't have nice things in this cesspool.  I've tried to have been reasoned and logical and others have been totally ad hominem.

Bullshit. What you are doing with your economic damages nonsense is essentially the same as you joining a conversation about a lawsuit involving a car wreck resulting in the death of a 6 year old and a 90 year old - both suffering 3rd degree burns over 80% of their bodies - and offering up an opinion that the economic damages look speculative.

When called on your tone deaf ass-hat comment, you point to the fact that a 6 year old and a 90 year old likely do not have jobs, and so have speculative damages.

In both my fatal car wreck example and the Jones defamation case, the primary cause of action and injury/damage has squat to do with lost wages (in the first example) or money spent on security cameras or other economic damages (in the second example).

The fact that you keep on flogging that economic damages bullshit means one of three things: 1) you are ignorant of legal terminology and causes of action, and think “economic damages” is the same thing as what a jury says you have to pay the plaintiff; or 2) just like ignoring the horrible deaths of the auto victims - you ignore the pain of the families of the dead children brought about by Jones’ lies and actions, and focus instead on the clearly least important aspect of the suit because you are a troll; 3) or because you genuinely do not see the defamation as that big a deal.

In an effort to bridge this obvious miscommunication gap, can you tell us if you are a troll or a sociopath…..or just really, really ignorant about the subject you are going on about?

(Hint: admitting you are ignorant is the best of the 3 options)

[DalTxHornFan 3130]

9 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Bullshit. What you are doing with your economic damages nonsense is essentially the same as you joining a conversation about a lawsuit involving a car wreck resulting in the death of a 6 year old and a 90 year old - both suffering 3rd degree burns over 80% of their bodies - and offering up an opinion that the economic damages look speculative.

When called on your tone deaf ass-hat comment, you point to the fact that a 6 year old and a 90 year old likely do not have jobs, and so have speculative damages.

In both my fatal car wreck example and the Jones defamation case, the primary cause of action and injury/damage has squat to do with lost wages (in the first example) or money spent on security cameras or other economic damages (in the second example).

The fact that you keep on flogging that economic damages bullshit means one of three things: 1) you are ignorant of legal terminology and causes of action, and think “economic damages” is the same thing as what a jury says you have to pay the plaintiff; or 2) just like ignoring the horrible deaths of the auto victims - you ignore the pain of the families of the dead children brought about by Jones’ lies and actions, and focus instead on the clearly least important aspect of the suit because you are a troll; 3) or because you genuinely do not see the defamation as that big a deal.

In an effort to bridge this obvious miscommunication gap, can you tell us if you are a troll or a sociopath…..or just really, really ignorant about the subject you are going on about?

(Hint: admitting you are ignorant is the best of the 3 options)

That was a lot of words.

[Gatorubet 30713]

That was a lot of words.

So troll then.

[DalTxHornFan 3130]

3 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

So troll then.

I am not trolling -- just analyzing damages with "reasonably certainty" -- which I understand to be the legal standard in play here.

[DDD Dad 14648]

I am not trolling -- just analyzing damages with "reasonably certainty" -- which I understand to be the legal standard in play here.

I take it you don’t do much personal injury litigation.

[TheRealRonWeaver? 1279]

I take it you don’t do much personal injury litigation.

Don’t be too hard on the kid. First semester Torts can be tough.

[Gatorubet 30713]

Don’t be too hard on the kid. First semester Torts can be tough.

Reasonably certainty

[Genco 3056]

19 hours ago, DalTxHornFan said:

a daughter of his half-sister married the son of one of my wife's college friends

[atomheartbevo 90642]

And just so we are clear, this was the Texas case.  Alex is fucking around and finding out in another case as well, with 6 parents.

He'll be pining for the days when he had to sell his Westlake house during his divorce.

https://twitter.com/connpost/status/1443966638294974467

Edited October 2, 2021 by atomheartbevo

[atomheartbevo 90642]

Whichever family ends up with Alex's MRAP, I'll happily volunteer to drive it around where he lives and where InfoWars is filmed a few times a week.  We can do a different banner every week.

[Bookman 4760]

It appears the defense strategy might have been to have the judge grant a death penalty sanction. That way, Alex Jones can plausibly claim that a jury didn't decide the merits of the case. It's probably the safest option for him, vis-a-vis his reputation with his viewers, which is his biggest asset and, I presume, cannot be executed on.

Actually, that's a good legal question. Can a judgment creditor in Texas attach someone's reputation?

[Willfully Horn 8261]

10 hours ago, Bookman said:

That way, Alex Jones can plausibly claim that a jury didn't decide the merits of the case. It's probably the safest option for him, vis-a-vis his reputation with his viewers, which is his biggest asset

 

 

[Bullneck 19518]

17 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

Bullshit. What you are doing with your economic damages nonsense is essentially the same as you joining a conversation about a lawsuit involving a car wreck resulting in the death of a 6 year old and a 90 year old - both suffering 3rd degree burns over 80% of their bodies - and offering up an opinion that the economic damages look speculative.

When called on your tone deaf ass-hat comment, you point to the fact that a 6 year old and a 90 year old likely do not have jobs, and so have speculative damages.

In both my fatal car wreck example and the Jones defamation case, the primary cause of action and injury/damage has squat to do with lost wages (in the first example) or money spent on security cameras or other economic damages (in the second example).

The fact that you keep on flogging that economic damages bullshit means one of three things: 1) you are ignorant of legal terminology and causes of action, and think “economic damages” is the same thing as what a jury says you have to pay the plaintiff; or 2) just like ignoring the horrible deaths of the auto victims - you ignore the pain of the families of the dead children brought about by Jones’ lies and actions, and focus instead on the clearly least important aspect of the suit because you are a troll; 3) or because you genuinely do not see the defamation as that big a deal.

In an effort to bridge this obvious miscommunication gap, can you tell us if you are a troll or a sociopath…..or just really, really ignorant about the subject you are going on about?

(Hint: admitting you are ignorant is the best of the 3 options)

/thread

[ChiTownDoc 21345]

God damn it.  Every time this shit is bumped I think he’s finally died of a massive  heart attack…

[Chad Fuck 18134]

God damn it.  Every time this shit is bumped I think he’s finally died of a massive  heart attack…

Keep checking. One day all your wildest dreams may come true.

[Fudge Nuggets 19454]

Can we discuss this connection of Jones and the death penalty in more detail?  Because that sounds like a really good idea. 

[Kyrie Eleison 9312]

3 hours ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Can we discuss this connection of Jones and the death penalty in more detail?  Because that sounds like a really good idea. 

it’s speculative at best…

[Gatorubet 30713]

I like Gritty emoji here but ideally we'd also have a crocodile weeping big fat tears for big fat alex. 

[MaybeACoordinator 8350]

Really really really good episode of Knowledge Fight, featuring Mark Bankston, lead attorney for the Sandy Hook families. 

 

 

[atomheartbevo 90642]

[Paul Wesley 3313]

11 hours ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

Really really really good episode of Knowledge Fight, featuring Mark Bankston, lead attorney for the Sandy Hook families. 

Thanks for posting.  I learned some things.

[RPM 26623]

On 10/3/2021 at 10:35 AM, ChiTownDoc said:

God damn it.  Every time this shit is bumped I think he’s finally died of a massive  heart attack…

Patience, Grasshopper. The Rush Limbaugh thread eventually paid off.

Edited October 5, 2021 by RPM

[Gatorubet 30713]

Patience, Grasshopper. The Rush Limbaugh thread eventually paid off.

Coward will check out if his world crumbles. Jones will off himself after broadcasting that he found proof that the Clinton murder machine is after him.

One third of America will believe this.

[atomheartbevo 90642]

4 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

Jones will off himself after broadcasting that he found proof that the Clinton murder machine is after him.

So you're saying that we should get on social media and quietly spread this theory, and gin up fake documents and the like and make sure they make it to his social media accounts?

[BrickHorn 18447]

On 10/3/2021 at 10:55 PM, MaybeACoordinator said:

Really really really good episode of Knowledge Fight, featuring Mark Bankston, lead attorney for the Sandy Hook families. 

 

 

Finally finished the ep and came here to post this. Bankston is a Longhorn. What’s his Surly handle?

[tx 3 putt 78676]

On 10/6/2021 at 9:16 AM, BrickHorn said:

Finally finished the ep and came here to post this. Bankston is a Longhorn. What’s his Surly handle?

@Hank Scorpio

[Gap03 3386]

More finding out by Alex Jones ...

Unfortunately, no heart attack yet, but Alex is definitely the type of little bitch to eat a bullet when the reality starts to settle in, so hang in there.

[Captainant 28533]

The especially idiotic thing in this case is that jones lost on a default judgement because he refused to give the court documents under order during discovery.

Must've been a real shit sandwich he was sitting on to take the L rather than fight it

[Horn Under a Bad Sign 20913]

Let's not forget that the DOJ is still investigating him for ties between himself, Roger Stone and the capitol rioters.

What a great year for Alex Jones.

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?


 

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19305]

8 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Let's not forget that the DOJ is still investigating him for ties between himself, Roger Stone and the capitol rioters.

What a great year for Alex Jones.

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?


 

Lots of steroids I would guess.

[MC Fresh Breath 4075]

12 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?


 

 

Golden Corral a few times a week should do it.

[Blotto 24017]

Let me preface this by stating I don't know shit about the law.  It sounds like the next step is a damages hearing which would determine the financial award? At that point can all the defendents just appeal the decision and tie this up for a couple more years in court? They had to know by not furnishing the requested documents that this would be the result, so it cant be a surprise to the defense. How long does the damages part last? it took two years to get to this stage, will they need financials etc.... to assess damages? Is this a significant milestone, or just one more step in this slow moving theatre of the absurd? 

[Longhorn_Fan68 34104]

21 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?

prison blowjobs

[atomheartbevo 90642]

[Gap03 3386]

1 hour ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?


 

Do you even Anthroplex, bro???

[TheStoicPaisano 9953]

[Kyrie Eleison 9312]

i've seen that pic a thousand times and i've yet to notice a difference between them other than either the lighting or whatever he's selling apparently raises the fuck outta your blood pressure.

[Mrs Whiggins 13050]

2 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?

Maybe it's like a thyroid goiter and he's slowly turning into Mr. Creosote

[TexasEd 8266]

4 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?
 

Alex claims to eat a lot of ass. You would think tossing salad would have fewer calories.  

[Underdog 29176]

That corn sneaks up on you, calorically speaking.

[Horndog 2295]

6 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Let's not forget that the DOJ is still investigating him for ties between himself, Roger Stone and the capitol rioters.

What a great year for Alex Jones.

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?


 

Ironic that he is wearing a tshirt celebrating scientific achievment.

[tantric superman 4668]

6 hours ago, Blotto said:

Let me preface this by stating I don't know shit about the law.  It sounds like the next step is a damages hearing which would determine the financial award? At that point can all the defendents just appeal the decision and tie this up for a couple more years in court? They had to know by not furnishing the requested documents that this would be the result, so it cant be a surprise to the defense. How long does the damages part last? it took two years to get to this stage, will they need financials etc.... to assess damages? Is this a significant milestone, or just one more step in this slow moving theatre of the absurd? 

At this stage, most parties would settle for tree fiddy thousand.

[tx 3 putt 78676]

A self imposed bullet to the head would make the world a much better place 

[TexasEd 8266]

19 hours ago, Blotto said:

Let me preface this by stating I don't know shit about the law.  It sounds like the next step is a damages hearing which would determine the financial award? At that point can all the defendents just appeal the decision and tie this up for a couple more years in court? They had to know by not furnishing the requested documents that this would be the result, so it cant be a surprise to the defense. How long does the damages part last? it took two years to get to this stage, will they need financials etc.... to assess damages? Is this a significant milestone, or just one more step in this slow moving theatre of the absurd? 

I don't know about the lay either but I did listen to the lawyers on that knowledge fight podcast and the plaintiff's attorney said that the trial phase is over.  Jones Fuck Around so long he lost any opportunity to defend his case on merits.  He lost and now it is deciding how much the damages are.

He can try to argue that there was no impact to the families or that they should not get any money but I don't think a non Q jury will be sympathetic to him with the evidence the plaintiffs have over the pervasive conduct. After award is determined AJ can appeal the award amount but never appeal the decision on merits, only on procedural and he won't get to the USSC since he does not have a decision to appeal.

[SydneyCarton 49483]

37 minutes ago, TexasEd said:

I don't know about the lay either but I did listen to the lawyers on that knowledge fight podcast and the plaintiff's attorney said that the trial phase is over.  Jones Fuck Around so long he lost any opportunity to defend his case on merits.  He lost and now it is deciding how much the damages are.

He can try to argue that there was no impact to the families or that they should not get any money but I don't think a non Q jury will be sympathetic to him with the evidence the plaintiffs have over the pervasive conduct. After award is determined AJ can appeal the award amount but never appeal the decision on merits, only on procedural and he won't get to the USSC since he does not have a decision to appeal.

So lets say they award millions in damages. Lets say he loses the appeal. What is then the process for liquidating everything he owns and making him a pauper?

[Goredho 17652]

20 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Let's not forget that the DOJ is still investigating him for ties between himself, Roger Stone and the capitol rioters.

What a great year for Alex Jones.

And what exactly does one have to do to get a neck like this?


 

[TexasEd 8266]

5 hours ago, Goredho said:

It's funny because he talks and acts like Cartman.  Every time I hear his voice I'm going to imagine it coming out of Cartman.

[High Plains Drifter 11187]

 

He really is like a 40 yr old Cartman.

 

Fuck, I'll never watch Southpark in the same way again.

[DDD Dad 14648]

13 minutes ago, TexasEd said:

It's funny because he talks and acts like Cartman.  Every time I hear his voice I'm going to imagine it coming out of Cartman.