Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

Dammit. Good catch. That’s what I get for posting during a meeting. He’ll be Sark to me when he’s won 10 games and played in a conference championship game. 

So, December 3rd. Got it.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Creasy Bear said:

I really hope we don't fuck this up and lose next week. 

I don't think losing is the issue. Losing bad might, like getting blown out. I don't see that happening though. I have a sneaking suspicion there is much more to the story. Not for Vasek, but the others. Maybe destiny has a plan for Sark and the longhorns. OU bad, aggy bad, NIL developing with the school with more money than anyone else. Maybe we are building the Death Star here.

Edited by Longhornlove
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, kwood4408 said:


Technically it’s Anthony Hill liking and reposting Arch’s post liking and tagging Hill and Toviano on Vasek’s commitment post

And I'm pretty sure this means his erection level for red teams has become very low:

image.png.0057af41d471174b14cc57fefc529eaf.png

  • Like 1
Posted

I’ve got to be honest, the aggy misery is making me much happier than the UT success.  I’m not sure what that says about me as a human being, but at this point our team has a ceiling this year in terms of what they can accomplish.  Maybe we win out, win the conference, and play in a respectable bowl game.  Yay progress!  Aggy has no floor.  The no floor part makes my dick harder than the respectable bowl game does.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, OnAComputer said:

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Sark hasn't been restricted by initial counters.
According to that breakdown, he signed 29.5 players per year vs 21.5 players per year the previous 7.

Posted

I put a link on the football board to a writer, that I know well, who is new to the MBG site. He covers Texas for them and does a preview of games on Thursday and a recap on Sunday. He's now doing a recruiting column on Tuesday. Here is his first one. If you're so inclined, give it a read and a share. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Mittens said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Sark hasn't been restricted by initial counters.
According to that breakdown, he signed 29.5 players per year vs 21.5 players per year the previous 7.

The NCCA has waived that rule for the past two years and even before when it was a rule, it was easy to circumvent. 
 

In other words, DONT WORRY ABOUT THE MOTHERFUCKING NUMBERS! 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...