Jump to content

Texas Recruiting Notes 2023: Strippers, Monkeys, and 5-Stars

Machinator

By Machinator
in 🤫$9.95🤫

 Share

Recommended Posts

JBJ

JBJ 3649

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

Epps was never a high end athlete. His 5+ 40 time at a Nike event will attest to that. He struggled to put on weight and strength. Most of the programs misses at TE have been guys that looked solid flexed out in HS, but never developed the skills to play in-line. It is the reason TE is one of the harder positions to evaluate. You have freaks like Duce, that can still be high end players flexed out. Finding guys that can block and be receiving threats is not easy. 

And most HS coaches don't have the overall talent on hand to 'waste' an athletic 6'4"+ player at TE.

They either play defense or get flexed out too much for a good eval.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 33.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Born Burnt
Born Burnt
hornlife
hornlife

49 in Sept.  It sucks - went from jogging and a swimmer to tremors and shakes.  I'm scared to death of fixing a light bulb on a ladder.  I just pray it isn't MS.  Neither have a blood test, it takes t

closetojumping
closetojumping

I know it feels like cool shit is happening, but Surly needs to gear all the fucking way up. Big big things coming. Let’s.Fucking.Go!

Posted Images

Hornlover

Hornlover 8824

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, BigHorn'13 said:

SIAP-- What's the deal on this guy and why haven't I seen him as a possibility? Running a 10.28 100m at 6'5 and 225lbs just seems unfair. 

https://247sports.com/Player/Nyckoles-Harbor-46114050/

Edited 34 minutes ago by BigHorn'13
Got distracted and forgot to post link to who I was referring to lol
 

Also, I'm pretty sure everybody on this board knew exactly who you were referring to, without the link. His combination of size and speed is unprecedented as a recruit, and he's been discussed fairly regularly over the past year.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UncleBuck

UncleBuck 6446

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, BigHorn'13 said:

SIAP-- What's the deal on this guy and why haven't I seen him as a possibility? Running a 10.28 100m at 6'5 and 225lbs just seems unfair. 

https://247sports.com/Player/Nyckoles-Harbor-46114050/

Not sure if anyone has answered you yet, but I'm going to say it's because he's not interested in us. I hope you finally have the answer you were looking for. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Burt Macklin

Burt Macklin 18998

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hiphopopotamos said:

Maybe Epps is who Pimpton ends up as.  They are certainly very similar physically,  but Epps issue was never athleticism or talent - it was desire.  You hope that Pimpton has a better mental eval.

Lol wut. Just because he was soft doesn’t mean he was otherwise gifted athletically. Epps ran a 5 second 40 at 225 lbs. Lack of athleticism and physical talent was absolutely a huge part of the problem with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
trythisathome

trythisathome 971

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
12 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

Lol wut. Just because he was soft doesn’t mean he was otherwise gifted athletically. Epps ran a 5 second 40 at 225 lbs. Lack of athleticism and physical talent was absolutely a huge part of the problem with him. 

Watching him try to beat press coverage against 5'10 DBs was like trying to fight people in your dreams

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
  • Haha 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BigHorn'13

BigHorn'13 3355

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Hornlover said:

Also, I'm pretty sure everybody on this board knew exactly who you were referring to, without the link. His combination of size and speed is unprecedented as a recruit, and he's been discussed fairly regularly over the past year.

 

32 minutes ago, UncleBuck said:

Not sure if anyone has answered you yet, but I'm going to say it's because he's not interested in us. I hope you finally have the answer you were looking for. 

Lol yes, mea culpa and all that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hiphopopotamos

Hiphopopotamos 20865

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

Lol wut. Just because he was soft doesn’t mean he was otherwise gifted athletically. Epps ran a 5 second 40 at 225 lbs. Lack of athleticism and physical talent was absolutely a huge part of the problem with him. 

I'm not talking about an NFL TE.  I'm talking about an effective starting college TE.  Someone who doesn't get embarrassed by a 5'6" DB.  A 5 second 40 is fine for a college TE.  Epps problem wasn't that he just wasn't athletic enough - his problem was that he couldn't or wouldn't put in the work in the weight room and didn't play with any effort on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UncleBuck

UncleBuck 6446

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Hiphopopotamos said:

I'm not talking about an NFL TE.  I'm talking about an effective starting college TE.  Someone who doesn't get embarrassed by a 5'6" DB.  A 5 second 40 is fine for a college TE.  Epps problem wasn't that he just wasn't athletic enough - his problem was that he couldn't or wouldn't put in the work in the weight room and didn't play with any effort on the field.

A lot of decent college TEs who run around the 4.8 or lower. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UncleBuck

UncleBuck 6446

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, JBJ said:

A decent amount of NFL TEs run 5.0s.  But not at 225 lbs.  And they don't run 4.7 shuttles at any weight.

And if he can still run a 5.0 at 250ish by the time he's in your program for a while, then that's not terrible for a TE, and also not indicative of overall athleticism. But I think I'm kinda going away from the discussion, so I'll tap out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JBJ

JBJ 3649

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, UncleBuck said:

And if he can still run a 5.0 at 250ish by the time he's in your program for a while, then that's not terrible for a TE, and also not indicative of overall athleticism. But I think I'm kinda going away from the discussion, so I'll tap out. 

I'm not really disagreeing with anyone.  40s are a poor measure of athleticism.  5.0 isn't terrible for a TE.  It's not great for a guy in a WR body, but if he can add weight AND doesn't slow down it's not terrible at all.  The shuttle time is a better indicator of athleticism, and his was not good at all.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdhorn92

jdhorn92 1538

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Ricky's one-hitter said:

Doesn't matter what you run if you can't get off the line. No amount of measurable athleticism would have overcome this level of bitchassedness

 

 

We were all over Epps when that one HS highlight reel was posted of him making an incredible catch over the middle.  After that we go nothing from him at the next level.  Suppose you could say that about a lot of guys, but man I thought he was the next Finley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Codaxx

Codaxx 5602

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, jdhorn92 said:

We were all over Epps when that one HS highlight reel was posted of him making an incredible catch over the middle.  After that we go nothing from him at the next level.  Suppose you could say that about a lot of guys, but man I thought he was the next Finley.

That is what makes TE evaluations so tough. You see these big kids "Mossing" HS DBs, because they are not getting separation. That is great, but if you are a TE that runs around the 5.0 mark, you will likely need to be a solid blocker to see the field.  Most of them are split out in HS, so making a projection on how they will fair on the LOS is pretty tough.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bevo

Bevo 13527

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, jdhorn92 said:

We were all over Epps when that one HS highlight reel was posted of him making an incredible catch over the middle.  After that we go nothing from him at the next level.  Suppose you could say that about a lot of guys, but man I thought he was the next Finley.

He is like a poor man's Finley. Well, maybe really poor, like homeless and living under a 183 bridge. But really, more like the hospice care's version of Finley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
satyanash

satyanash 14281

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Ricky's one-hitter said:

Doesn't matter what you run if you can't get off the line. No amount of measurable athleticism would have overcome this level of bitchassedness

 

 

A somehow worse version of Dan Buckner, who was so bad we just stopped using the flex WR his final year.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MH BEVO

MH BEVO 1264

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, Ricky's one-hitter said:

Doesn't matter what you run if you can't get off the line. No amount of measurable athleticism would have overcome this level of bitchassedness

 

 

Was this the time that our WR coach was just telling them “use your athletic ability to beat them off the line” …and that was it… that was the coaching. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Burt Macklin

Burt Macklin 18998

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, jdhorn92 said:

We were all over Epps when that one HS highlight reel was posted of him making an incredible catch over the middle.  After that we go nothing from him at the next level.  Suppose you could say that about a lot of guys, but man I thought he was the next Finley.

What kind of revisionist history is this? There were plenty of people on this board that thought Epps was an underwhelming take while he was a recruit. I always hated the take because he was going to have to become an extremely good blocker to pan out at TE, and there was nothing  that indicated he would become a blocker. He always viewed himself as a receiver/receiving TE, despite lacking the athleticism to create any separation. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Codaxx

Codaxx 5602

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Hiphopopotamos said:

5 of the 12 TE's who ran at this years NFL combine ran 4.8 or slower.  Last year 7 of the 21 that ran were 4.8 or above including 3 that ran 5+.

I think this is confusing the discussion. Here are the top 10 TEs in the NFL (https://www.nfl.com/news/2022-nfl-season-s-top-10-tight-ends-travis-kelce-mark-andrews-and-david-njoku-he). These are guys that are generally receiving threats. This is what they run:

Kelce 4.61
Andrews 4.67
Njoku 4.64
Goedert 4.67
Ertz 4.76
Dissly  4.87
Freiermuth 4.77
Hockenson 4.7
Higbee  4.62
Conklin 4.8

I have long said that blocking TEs can have a long career in the NFL. There is a big difference, between receiving TEs and blocking TEs. When we look at highlights on this board, it is mostly of TEs split out catching the football. We are not discussing their blocking ability. My comment on Pimpton was that I did not see the athleticism to be a big time receiving threat and his success would be tied to his ability to adjust to playing with his hand in the ground, which makes his projection kind of tough. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdhorn92

jdhorn92 1538

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Burt Macklin said:

What kind of revisionist history is this? There were plenty of people on this board that thought Epps was an underwhelming take while he was a recruit. I always hated the take because he was going to have to become an extremely good blocker to pan out at TE, and there was nothing  that indicated he would become a blocker. He always viewed himself as a receiver/receiving TE, despite lacking the athleticism to create any separation. 

Fair enough.  Looked like Tarzan, played like Jane

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NWAustinDude

NWAustinDude 2252

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mitch Cumsteen said:

I really appreciate Inside Texas posting that free article, which is literally just a recap of his Instagram post including quoting the post.  That's some solid $9.95-ing there.

And the best part is that it gives a deserved break to surly's 9.95er copy-pasters, who then have a precious moment to snort some lines and scratch their butt with a shrimp fork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheMailBox357

TheMailBox357 213

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, NWAustinDude said:

 

 

1 hour ago, Mitch Cumsteen said:

I really appreciate Inside Texas posting that free article, which is literally just a recap of his Instagram post including quoting the post.  That's some solid $9.95-ing there

Than I gotta assume the article is from Joe Cook. If the article was from Nahlin, Wells, or Hamilton, they would've reported some inside info.

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...