Jump to content

What's going on with this DNI Whistleblower ?

triplehorn

By triplehorn
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Js1
Js1

I'm sure you took both sides of that debate. 

Crusher
Crusher

First off there was no extortion. That was not in the transcript. No quid pro quo. Why do you make up shit? Who do you think you are, Adam Schiff?  

Post Oak
Post Oak

I spent a lot of time thinking about this, unfortunately. You have to have so little self-respect that you are ok being lied to over and over.  You have to be ok with being told what to do.  You

Posted Images

ousuxndallas

ousuxndallas 65

Posted
Posted

Just dropping by to laugh at you fools.

First, it was Russia collusion. That didn't work.
Then it was the Mueller report. That fizzled out.
Then it was racism. That didn't work.
Now it's Ukraine.

The Democrats are scared to death POTUS is going to be reelected, and are just throwing shit against the wall. This is very entertaining.

  • Fuck You 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45898

Posted
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

Bullshit.  Giuliani is not attorney to the President of the United States.  That’s the role of the White House Counsel’s Office.  Rudy is personal lawyer to Donald Trump.  That phone call was not a personal call.  It was an official call in Trump’s capacity as President.  

I get that.  To me, it's a "better to ask for forgiveness later than permission now" situation.  (Not that Trump or Rudy would ever ask for forgiveness, but you know what I mean.)  I think your argument is sound, but it's not bulletproof, and ultimately this particular detail is so far down the list of transgressions I give a shit about that . . . well, I just don't really give a shit.

Edited by jimmyjazz
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21186

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Captainant said:

The upshot here is that the law is squarely and statutorily on their side. They're getting the full complaint with or without the consent of the executive, unless laws just don't matter anymore. Which is not out of the realm of possibility at this point

They don't.  At least as it pertains to Il Douche.  And the Dems will, weakly, protest and be very concerned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Hand

Mojo Hand 4580

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ousuxndallas said:

Just dropping by to laugh at you fools.

First, it was Russia collusion. That didn't work.
Then it was the Mueller report. That fizzled out.
Then it was racism. That didn't work.
Now it's Ukraine.

The Democrats are scared to death POTUS is going to be reelected, and are just throwing shit against the wall. This is very entertaining.

Tom Cruise similarly gets a big laugh out of people who just don't get it when it comes to Xenu and the Thetans infesting our bodies.   

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Hand

Mojo Hand 4580

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Red Five said:

What I can’t wait for is when it’s proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that Trump extorted Ukraine in order to help win an election, and we once again hear “that’s it? We already knew that! Move on libs, get over it!!”.

Totally.   That's always the play.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45673

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, ousuxndallas said:

Just dropping by to laugh at you fools.

First, it was Russia collusion. That didn't work.
Then it was the Mueller report. That fizzled out.
Then it was racism. That didn't work.
Now it's Ukraine.

The Democrats are scared to death POTUS is going to be reelected, and are just throwing shit against the wall. This is very entertaining.

tenor.gif?itemid=13738017

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Hand

Mojo Hand 4580

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Transcript:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

 

Holy shit, that's supposed to be the dud part of all of this?   Not only does he says he wants them to look into the Biden situation, he expressly designates Giuliani as his representative for further discussions.   There's no way to claim that Giuliani was acting without his knowledge now, and Giuliani has already copped to it all.   Plus all of the other shit... This is a smoking gun. 

Edited by Mojo Hand
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23469

Posted
Posted

Not sure how the "promise" that originally spun this up comes from that transcript.

putting on the tinfoil hat, I bet that the IC has been listening to Trump and Rudy's conversations, that Trump said something in the course of those conversation that could be construed as promising assistance to be cleared for Ukraine if they cooperate, and that the content of those communications were scuttlebutt at some level among IC staffers. Would fit the pattern, privileged communication, series of communications, no first hand knowledge of the actual communications.  WP report should be interesting if they don't redact too much of it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jester

Jester 382

Posted
Posted

lol.  So, question.  Mueller report didn't charge Trump with receiving/asking help from Russians because he 1. didn't act 'knowingly and willfully' and 2. proving the value of the information sought would be too difficult.  In other words, he didn't realize his actions were unlawful so he couldn't be charged and the 'value' of that information would be hard to prove up to meet the monetary threshhold.

Fast forward to this.  Admitted to asking another foreign country for help.  Check 1 off the list.  He knows his conduct is unlawful now.  Question seems to be how do you prove up the value of an investigation?  Do you bank on the 361mm foreign aid as the 'value'?  Seems logical.

All of that being said, I realize I'm asking about the orange goblin being indicted.  Conduct is definitely impeachable.  But he needs to rot.

Fingers crossed that Guliani gets his ass indicted and we get a road map.

We might need an Ukraine indictment thread.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SameSame

SameSame 1704

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, ousuxndallas said:

Just dropping by to laugh at you fools.

First, it was Russia collusion. That didn't work.
Then it was the Mueller report. That fizzled out.
Then it was racism. That didn't work.
Now it's Ukraine.

The Democrats are scared to death POTUS is going to be reelected, and are just throwing shit against the wall. This is very entertaining.

Fool you didn't type haha or lol, so we all know you're lying. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8712

Posted
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

Not sure how the "promise" that originally spun this up comes from that transcript.

putting on the tinfoil hat, I bet that the IC has been listening to Trump and Rudy's conversations, that Trump said something in the course of those conversation that could be construed as promising assistance to be cleared for Ukraine if they cooperate, and that the content of those communications were scuttlebutt at some level among IC staffers. Would fit the pattern, privileged communication, series of communications, no first hand knowledge of the actual communications.  WP report should be interesting if they don't redact too much of it.  

Aid was cut off days before that call at unilateral direction of the President. People don’t simply say “I’m extorting you.” They create need/urgency and then ask a favor. Which is exactly what happened 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23469

Posted
Posted
Just now, Pig Bellmont said:

Aid was cut off days before that call at unilateral direction of the President. People don’t simply say “I’m extorting you.” They create need/urgency and then ask a favor. Which is exactly what happened 

Trump had to say or do something that was construed as a "promise", either directly or indirectly.  That, or the initial reporting took quite some liberty with the emphasis on that word. 

  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Chick

Bama Chick 28596

Posted
Posted
Just dropping by to laugh at you fools.

First, it was Russia collusion. That didn't work.
Then it was the Mueller report. That fizzled out.
Then it was racism. That didn't work.
Now it's Ukraine.

The Democrats are scared to death POTUS is going to be reelected, and are just throwing shit against the wall. This is very entertaining.


Lolololololol you picked a super time to bless us with this hot take!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bolverk

bolverk 29660

Posted
Posted

He explicitly invokes both Barr and Giuliani in the same sentence as part of a coordinated effort:

Quote

Well, she' s [former US ambassador] going to go through some things. I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45898

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Trump had to say or do something that was construed as a "promise", either directly or indirectly.  That, or the initial reporting took quite some liberty with the emphasis on that word. 

Keep in mind that this single phone call is most likely a subset of the complaints in the whistleblower's report.  Trump is almost surely trying to create the perception that there's no "there" there since this particular transcript doesn't represent a fatal blow.  This is basically a different flavor of Barr's "summary" of the Mueller report (and we all know how that played out -- the "summary" worked, even though it was disingenuous, to be charitable).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18854

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, ousuxndallas said:

Just dropping by to laugh at you fools.

First, it was Russia collusion. That didn't work.
Then it was the Mueller report. That fizzled out.
Then it was racism. That didn't work.
Now it's Ukraine.

The Democrats are scared to death POTUS is going to be reelected, and are just throwing shit against the wall. This is very entertaining.

Making the United States weak to own the libs.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lemonlime

lemonlime 5503

Posted
Posted
Just now, HenryJames said:

I just think it's cool that the White House thought the release of this transcript would help them.

Reality is what they say it is.  The hurricane is going to hit Alabama.  Biggest crowds ever at the inauguration.  The transcript completely exonerates trump and shows a perfect, beautiful conversation.  The sky is purple. Whatever.   What it actually says makes no difference anymore.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23469

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Keep in mind that this single phone call is most likely a subset of the complaints in the whistleblower's report.  Trump is almost surely trying to create the perception that there's no "there" there since this particular transcript doesn't represent a fatal blow.  This is basically a different flavor of Barr's "summary" of the Mueller report (and we all know how that played out -- the "summary" worked, even though it was disingenuous, to be charitable).

Agree.  That fits the reporting regarding the nature of the WB report. So the question is, what other exchanges relate to the balance of the complaints?  Which of those approach a quid pro quo or a promise?  Which involve privileged communications? Mark me on a Trump-Rudy phone call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Hand

Mojo Hand 4580

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Trump had to say or do something that was construed as a "promise", either directly or indirectly.  That, or the initial reporting took quite some liberty with the emphasis on that word. 

Seriously?

-- Trump blocks aid that was on the way

-- Trump says you know, we do a lot for you financially.  I'm not saying it has to be reciprocal, but... I do have a favor to ask 

-- Trump says, it would be great if you investigated the server and Biden's involvement in the investigation.  Will you talk to Barr and Rudy? 

-- Zelensky says yes

-- Trump says great, I have a feeling your economy will be improving very soon. 

That's about as clear cut as it gets.  And that's just from a sanitized transcript of one call in a series of transactions reportedly detailed in the whistleblower complaint. 

 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...