Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The lawsuit, filed last year by Natalie D. Simms, alleges now-retired SAPD Detective Mara Wilson conducted an illegal vaginal cavity search on Simms after she was approached by officers while she sat on a curb waiting for her boyfriend. 

According to the allegations in the suit, Wilson, a 32-year force veteran, slid down Simms' shorts and examined her vagina in view of the street while male officers were present. The officer also pulled a tampon from Simms’ vagina and held it up, inspecting it in front of the other cops. 

According to the suit, Wilson was never disciplined for the search because internal affairs found that she hadn't violated any department policies. She retired in 2017.


https://m.sacurrent.com/the-daily/archives/2019/10/14/city-of-san-antonio-plans-to-pay-settlement-to-woman-after-detective-searched-her-vagina-in-middle-of-the-street

Posted

Everyone's boat floats a little differently, but I'm damn sure if I were a cop and top brass assigned me to "inspect male genitals" duty I'd quit on the spot.  I can't even imagine who would sign up for cavity search detail, EVEN IF they were gay (NTTIAWWT).

Posted (edited)

I want to know how internal affairs concluded she didn’t violate any policy. Would love to read the policy that allows pulling a tampon out in public. 

Edited by hookem17
Posted
1 minute ago, hookem17 said:

I want to know how internal affairs concluded she didn’t violate any policy. Would love to read the policy that allows pulling a tampon out in public. 

Thought it was a crack pipe

Posted
2 hours ago, Sandman said:

I thought it was a sex move that I was far too old or sheltered to have heard about.

I thought it was another one of those alt-mascots for the minor league baseball team.  

Posted (edited)

Protecting and serving:

Quote

Wilson pulled Natalie's pants and underwear down in public and used her flashlight to search the area, in addition to pulling a string attached to a tampon out of Simms vagina, according to the lawsuit.

The conversation between Simms and Wilson, taken directly from the lawsuit, reads:

WILSON: Uh-huh. Are you wearing a tampon, too?
SIMMS: Yes.
WILSON: Okay. I just want to make sure that's what it is. Is that a tampon?
SIMMS: Come on. Yes.
WILSON: Huh? Is that a tampon?
SIMMS: It's full of blood, right? Why would you do that?
WILSON: I don't know. It looked like it had stuff in there.
SIMMS: There ain't nothing in there.

Wilson also commented on the amount of pubic hair Simms had and continued to tell Simms they could not go to the police station to finish conducting the search, despite Simms' persistence, the lawsuit states.

Bonus:

Quote

The suit references video footage taken from a squad car camera that appears to show Simms raising objections when it appeared Wilson was ready to probe her anus to continue the search.

"Officer Wilson had violated Natalie vaginally, and now it appeared that she might violate Natalie anally," the lawsuit alleges. "She was doing so without a warrant, with no medical personnel present, and on a public street in view of several people as well as those passing by."

 

Edited by Beau Vine

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...