Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Shits getting spooky out here. She apparently has Putin’s backing and after watching the debate the other night I’m starting to think it’s true. 
 

Not to mention Hillary just came out and out right attacked her for it. Not a Hillary fan, but she was right about Trump. What say y’all?

  • Like 1
Posted

 There is no evidence she’s working hand in hand with the Kremlin on a conspiracy level.  However, she routinely spouts Russian talking points, never criticizes Putin, and Russian media keeps boosting her candidacy without any pushback from Tulsi.  

Call that whatever you want. 

Posted (edited)

Fine, I'll call it a sequel to "The Saint" starring Fat Kilmer and Tulsi as middle-aged, but still sexy Elizabeth Shue.  Here to unravel global energy markets,...or are they?  

Edited by Lobo
Posted

I think she's a useful idiot and Russia is  backing her any way they can.   I don't think she's purposely colluding, but you can be an intelligence "asset" without realizing it. 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mojo Hand said:

I think she's a useful idiot and Russia is  backing her any way they can.   I don't think she's purposely colluding, but you can be an intelligence "asset" without realizing it. 

If she became President, she would be Putin’s bitch.   That’s all you really need to know in this debate. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

If she became President, she would be Putin’s bitch.   That’s all you really need to know in this debate. 

That's not even worth debating.  She has no chance.  The threat she poses is as a spoiler 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mojo Hand said:

That's not even worth debating.  She has no chance.  The threat she poses is as a spoiler 

Wouldn't she pull more votes from Trump than the D nominee? 

  • Like 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Fine, I'll call it a sequel to "The Saint" starring Fat Kilmer and Tulsi as middle-aged, but still sexy Elizabeth Shue.  Here to unravel global energy markets,...or are they?  

 

Does Tulsi get naked in your version?  If so, it might change my opinion of your screenplay. 

Posted

I know we're living in a sensitive time with regard to degrading women of power.  I have two daughters.  I am woke.  I support #metoo.  I get it.  

I'm just gonna toss something out there.  If you like it, keep it.  If you don't, toss it back.

I've spent some time, for a friend, on pornhub. 

There's obviously some hot Russian produced, Hawaiian on Hungarian porn out there with her in it.  And I want to see it.  I want to be on it.  I want to feel it.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mojo Hand said:

She has no chance.  The threat she poses is as a spoiler 

There’s a possibility she could end up spoiling it for Trump.  She’s valuable because she could influence the election in either direction depending on the messaging. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

There’s a possibility she could end up spoiling it for Trump.  She’s valuable because she could influence the election in either direction depending on the messaging. 

Give it up, for the love of god.

Hillary just outright shit the bed.

  • Like 5
Posted
38 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

If she became President, she would be Putin’s bitch.   That’s all you really need to know in this debate. 

Fuck off with that.  And for the millionth time fuck fucking Hillary Clinton

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Lurch said:

 


To be fair, Donald is Putin’s bitch.to be fair letterkenny problems GIF

 

Whoops, well it would have been a lot cooler if you put the gyf in.

Edited by workswithseed
Posted

I don't know if she's a Russian plant, but I've read some of her positions and they don't add up to a carefully considered world view.  I can't figure out how she got this far.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

I don't know if she's a Russian plant, but I've read some of her positions and they don't add up to a carefully considered world view.  I can't figure out how she got this far.

Do I detect sarcasm? 3% in the polls isn't far at all.

Posted
43 minutes ago, berlinerbaer said:

Do I detect sarcasm? 3% in the polls isn't far at all.

Well, she's polling stronger than I am, so there's that.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Viper said:

Hillary is becoming unhinged. 

This.

Why is a twice-failed presidential candidate attacking a sitting member of Congress as an agent of a foreign enemy with zero evidence?

Get your fucking shinebox, Hillary, go collapse in the woods.

  • Like 7
Posted
If she runs a third-party campaign we have our answer. The Jill Stein we’d hate to see go, but enjoy watching leave. 

Pretty much...

The manner in which she made the last debate is highly suspect. You can put me in the “who the hell is supporting her?!” camp.
  • Like 2
Posted

A friend is a fox news addict and Tulsi is his favorite Democratic candidate. He keeps telling me I should vote for her.

I suspect that a lot of her support comes from Republican trolls.

  • Like 2
Posted

Pretty much...

The manner in which she made the last debate is highly suspect. You can put me in the “who the hell is supporting her?!” camp.


Single-issue foreign policy isolationists. People who like rand Paul and people who like Noam Chomsky. Politics, strange bedfellows, horseshoe theory, whathaveyou...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Posted

These quotes tell me all I need to know about her.

Quote

Stephen K. Bannon, President Donald Trump’s former chief strategist, is impressed with her political talent. Richard B. Spencer, the white nationalist leader, says he could vote for her. Former Rep. Ron Paul praises her “libertarian instincts,” while Franklin Graham, the influential evangelist, finds her “refreshing.”

Quote

And far-right conspiracy theorists like Mike Cernovich see a certain MAGA sais quoi. “She’s got a good energy, a good vibe. You feel like this is just a serious person,” Cernovich said. “She seems very Trumpian.”

Quote

Then there is 4chan, the notoriously toxic online message board, where some right-wing trolls and anti-Semites fawn over Gabbard, calling her “Mommy” and praising her willingness to criticize Israel. In April, the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website, took credit for Gabbard’s qualification for the first two Democratic primary debates.

Brian Levin, the head of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University-San Bernardino, said Gabbard had “the seal of approval” within white nationalist circles. “If people have that isolationist worldview, there is one candidate that could best express them on each side: Gabbard on the Democratic side and Trump on the Republican side,” Levin said.

Gabbard has disavowed some of her most hateful supporters, castigating the news media for giving “any oxygen at all” to the endorsement she won from the white nationalist leader David Duke. But her frequent appearances on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show have buoyed her support in right-wing circles.

https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiECRdRAQ89Q3lflaob3n0t74qGAgEKg8IACoHCAow3rvTBDD89X4w8YzmBQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

This.

Why is a twice-failed presidential candidate attacking a sitting member of Congress as an agent of a foreign enemy with zero evidence?

Get your fucking shinebox, Hillary, go collapse in the woods.

I always figured the Clintons to be tools of the Chinamen. Y'know, the dog that didn't bark.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RDCanecutter said:

I always figured the Clintons to be tools of the Chinamen. Y'know, the dog that didn't bark.

Nah they're just controlled by whoever has video of Bill raping teenage girls with Epstein

Posted
2 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Nah they're just controlled by whoever has video of Bill raping teenage girls with Epstein

I just got hold of a 1/20th oz Gold Panda, so I was kinda hoping that person would be my new Middle Kingdom masters.

  • Like 1
Posted

UN ambassador Gabbard

Quote

Trump shares many of Gabbard’s instincts on foreign policy, including skepticism of U.S. military intervention in Syria and distrust of the rebels, who both see as worse than the Assad regime. Both have criticized the neoconservative current in foreign policy and expressed support for working with Russia in the Middle East.

But Trump has never gone so far as to work to prevent the international community from holding the Assad regime and its partners accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Gabbard proudly has.

In March, Gabbard was one of only three lawmakers — and the only Democrat — to vote against a non-binding resolution calling out the Assad regime for war crimes and stating that the United States should support the establishment of an international tribunal to bring war criminals to justice. She tweeted that the resolution was a thinly veiled call for regime change in Syria and compared it to congressional action before the Iraq and Libya wars.

Gabbard specifically objected to language in the bill that called for additional protections for civilians inside Syria and actions to ensure access to humanitarian aid in targeted areas. In a news release, she called that “a thinly veiled attempt to use the rationale of ‘humanitarianism’ as a justification for overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad.”

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Wiler77 said:

I just came here to say that is the sexiest woman on the face of the planet.

Not Tulsi.  Padma Lakshmi.  

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

This.

Why is a twice-failed presidential candidate attacking a sitting member of Congress as an agent of a foreign enemy with zero evidence?

Get your fucking shinebox, Hillary, go collapse in the woods.

Tulsi flopped in the last debate and she was likely on her way to being an afterthought in the primary.

Instead, fucking Hillary has given her ammunition for her next 20 Fox News appearances. Not that anyone who watches Fox News matters in the Democratic primary, but there goes any chance of Tulsi going away quietly.

With that said, she isn't a Russian agent. Any American supporting a draw down of our global military engagement is naturally going to align with the interests of any of our adversaries. The Russians are actively supporting her because Republicans have ensured that they can, rather than because she asked them.

She IS an attention whore, a trait she shares with Hillary.



×
×
  • Create New...