Jump to content

Is Tulsi Gabbard A Russian Asset?

USMCHorn

By USMCHorn
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

USMCHorn

USMCHorn 1369

Posted
Posted

Shits getting spooky out here. She apparently has Putin’s backing and after watching the debate the other night I’m starting to think it’s true. 
 

Not to mention Hillary just came out and out right attacked her for it. Not a Hillary fan, but she was right about Trump. What say y’all?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 884
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Red Five
Red Five

I'm not sure if she's a Russian asset. I am sure however that I want to lick her box. 

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

*clicks on random page in Hillary thread*   Onboard 2.0     2,843          #1

Hank Scorpio
Hank Scorpio

How did you get in here? Did someone leave the door open? Get out of here! Shoo!       

Posted Images

Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted

 There is no evidence she’s working hand in hand with the Kremlin on a conspiracy level.  However, she routinely spouts Russian talking points, never criticizes Putin, and Russian media keeps boosting her candidacy without any pushback from Tulsi.  

Call that whatever you want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted (edited)

Fine, I'll call it a sequel to "The Saint" starring Fat Kilmer and Tulsi as middle-aged, but still sexy Elizabeth Shue.  Here to unravel global energy markets,...or are they?  

Edited by Lobo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Herpa Derpa said:

She wins every poll on Drudge.  Whatever that means.

According to recent legit polling data, 20% of Tulsi supporters are 2016 Trump voters.  This is the highest percentage among all democratic candidates.

It’s in here somewhere:

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/kvoamfqbbo/econTabReport.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mojo Hand said:

I think she's a useful idiot and Russia is  backing her any way they can.   I don't think she's purposely colluding, but you can be an intelligence "asset" without realizing it. 

If she became President, she would be Putin’s bitch.   That’s all you really need to know in this debate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Under a Bad Sign

Horn Under a Bad Sign 20402

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Fine, I'll call it a sequel to "The Saint" starring Fat Kilmer and Tulsi as middle-aged, but still sexy Elizabeth Shue.  Here to unravel global energy markets,...or are they?  

 

Does Tulsi get naked in your version?  If so, it might change my opinion of your screenplay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted

I know we're living in a sensitive time with regard to degrading women of power.  I have two daughters.  I am woke.  I support #metoo.  I get it.  

I'm just gonna toss something out there.  If you like it, keep it.  If you don't, toss it back.

I've spent some time, for a friend, on pornhub. 

There's obviously some hot Russian produced, Hawaiian on Hungarian porn out there with her in it.  And I want to see it.  I want to be on it.  I want to feel it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Incredulity

Incredulity 11675

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

There’s a possibility she could end up spoiling it for Trump.  She’s valuable because she could influence the election in either direction depending on the messaging. 

Give it up, for the love of god.

Hillary just outright shit the bed.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Party_Taco

Party_Taco 3741

Posted
Posted
If she runs a third-party campaign we have our answer. The Jill Stein we’d hate to see go, but enjoy watching leave. 

Pretty much...

The manner in which she made the last debate is highly suspect. You can put me in the “who the hell is supporting her?!” camp.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grandioso

Grandioso 2592

Posted
Posted

Pretty much...

The manner in which she made the last debate is highly suspect. You can put me in the “who the hell is supporting her?!” camp.


Single-issue foreign policy isolationists. People who like rand Paul and people who like Noam Chomsky. Politics, strange bedfellows, horseshoe theory, whathaveyou...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Judge Roybeanbag

Judge Roybeanbag 11819

Posted
Posted

These quotes tell me all I need to know about her.

Quote

Stephen K. Bannon, President Donald Trump’s former chief strategist, is impressed with her political talent. Richard B. Spencer, the white nationalist leader, says he could vote for her. Former Rep. Ron Paul praises her “libertarian instincts,” while Franklin Graham, the influential evangelist, finds her “refreshing.”

Quote

And far-right conspiracy theorists like Mike Cernovich see a certain MAGA sais quoi. “She’s got a good energy, a good vibe. You feel like this is just a serious person,” Cernovich said. “She seems very Trumpian.”

Quote

Then there is 4chan, the notoriously toxic online message board, where some right-wing trolls and anti-Semites fawn over Gabbard, calling her “Mommy” and praising her willingness to criticize Israel. In April, the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website, took credit for Gabbard’s qualification for the first two Democratic primary debates.

Brian Levin, the head of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University-San Bernardino, said Gabbard had “the seal of approval” within white nationalist circles. “If people have that isolationist worldview, there is one candidate that could best express them on each side: Gabbard on the Democratic side and Trump on the Republican side,” Levin said.

Gabbard has disavowed some of her most hateful supporters, castigating the news media for giving “any oxygen at all” to the endorsement she won from the white nationalist leader David Duke. But her frequent appearances on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show have buoyed her support in right-wing circles.

https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiECRdRAQ89Q3lflaob3n0t74qGAgEKg8IACoHCAow3rvTBDD89X4w8YzmBQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RDCanecutter

RDCanecutter 26447

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

This.

Why is a twice-failed presidential candidate attacking a sitting member of Congress as an agent of a foreign enemy with zero evidence?

Get your fucking shinebox, Hillary, go collapse in the woods.

I always figured the Clintons to be tools of the Chinamen. Y'know, the dog that didn't bark.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TDunk

TDunk 590

Posted
Posted

UN ambassador Gabbard

Quote

Trump shares many of Gabbard’s instincts on foreign policy, including skepticism of U.S. military intervention in Syria and distrust of the rebels, who both see as worse than the Assad regime. Both have criticized the neoconservative current in foreign policy and expressed support for working with Russia in the Middle East.

But Trump has never gone so far as to work to prevent the international community from holding the Assad regime and its partners accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Gabbard proudly has.

In March, Gabbard was one of only three lawmakers — and the only Democrat — to vote against a non-binding resolution calling out the Assad regime for war crimes and stating that the United States should support the establishment of an international tribunal to bring war criminals to justice. She tweeted that the resolution was a thinly veiled call for regime change in Syria and compared it to congressional action before the Iraq and Libya wars.

Gabbard specifically objected to language in the bill that called for additional protections for civilians inside Syria and actions to ensure access to humanitarian aid in targeted areas. In a news release, she called that “a thinly veiled attempt to use the rationale of ‘humanitarianism’ as a justification for overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
berlinerbaer

berlinerbaer 678

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

This.

Why is a twice-failed presidential candidate attacking a sitting member of Congress as an agent of a foreign enemy with zero evidence?

Get your fucking shinebox, Hillary, go collapse in the woods.

Tulsi flopped in the last debate and she was likely on her way to being an afterthought in the primary.

Instead, fucking Hillary has given her ammunition for her next 20 Fox News appearances. Not that anyone who watches Fox News matters in the Democratic primary, but there goes any chance of Tulsi going away quietly.

With that said, she isn't a Russian agent. Any American supporting a draw down of our global military engagement is naturally going to align with the interests of any of our adversaries. The Russians are actively supporting her because Republicans have ensured that they can, rather than because she asked them.

She IS an attention whore, a trait she shares with Hillary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...