Jump to content

Cop Caught Copping Caress of a Corpse


Viper

Recommended Posts

No word yet on if he'll try to say it's a victimless crime like shoplifting or punching someone in the dark.

https://reason.com/2019/12/04/a-california-cops-body-camera-captured-him-fondling-a-dead-womans-breasts/

Quote

A veteran officer with the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) captured himself fondling a corpse on his own body camera.

The Los Angeles Times reports that an unnamed officer in the Central Division responded to a call about a dead woman in a residential apartment. After arriving, the officer and his partner concluded that the woman was in fact deceased. When the unnamed officer's partner returned to the patrol car to retrieve something, the disturbing incident occurred.

The offending officer turned his body camera off and fondled the dead woman's breasts. When he turned the camera on again, a portion of his actions were captured. When an LAPD body camera is activated, a two-minute buffer saves any audio and visual that occurred prior.

LAPD officials found the footage in a random inspection. Last month, Chief Michel Moore announced that the department would review footage to identify instances of poor policing training and bias.

 

Josh Rubenstein, a spokesperson for the LAPD, told the Times that an administrative investigation was "immediately launched" and the unnamed officer was placed on leave.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In New York they just rape them

https://reason.com/2017/10/23/nypd-slut-shames-teen-who-says-she-was-r/

Quote

Cops Claim Teen Consented to Sex in Their Custody, Point Prosecutors to Her 'Provocative' Selfies

Repeat after me, NYPD: Instagram is not consent.

you might have to deal with probation for accepting a bribe though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is the suspect's name being withheld? He's not a minor and should be afforded no protection as such. Assuming what he did is illegal, why hasn't he been arrested?

If this had been perpetrated by, you know, one of the common folk, wouldn't LE have arrested the suspect and released his (or her) name and mugshot to the public?

The sooner they make police body cams persistent and pervasive the better. i.e., they should always be on and an officer should not be able to remove or disable them until off duty. If you're truly there to protect and serve the best interests of the people, you should want this because it would cover your ass against false accusations and corroborate any statements or testimony you gave.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2019 at 2:21 PM, Braff Zacklin said:

Why is the suspect's name being withheld? He's not a minor and should be afforded no protection as such. Assuming what he did is illegal, why hasn't he been arrested?

If this had been perpetrated by, you know, one of the common folk, wouldn't LE have arrested the suspect and released his (or her) name and mugshot to the public?

The sooner they make police body cams persistent and pervasive the better. i.e., they should always be on and an officer should not be able to remove or disable them until off duty. If you're truly there to protect and serve the best interests of the people, you should want this because it would cover your ass against false accusations and corroborate any statements or testimony you gave.

 

When’s the last time you actually saw that on a cop car?  I haven’t seen it in a decade. I don’t believe it is their motto any more. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...