Google/Youtube going to go the same as Facebook?

[SmokeyBear1861 107]

 

Notice anything missing? 

Soon it will be more and more obvious, but Google has been doing the same data mining and censorship shit as facebook, blaming it on their algorithms. It's pretty clear from their one sided censorship at youtube that isn't the case. The algorithm demonetizes, requires age verification, or deletes videos that go against their views. While they may be a private company, they still have to follow their own rules and treat their customers fairly. Pretty interesting as the newer generations are increasingly programmed by these gadgets, they are just getting the one-sided version of reality instead of the whole picture. In my view this causes many to seek out the Truth, and drives them further away from the original message they were trying to push.

I always thought the whole purpose of freedom of speech was to let all sides express their opinions, then let the best arguments win over the hearts and minds of the public. As soon as you begin restricting some, it has the Streisand effect, as well as escalation... 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF7mkyd-Wm4

A video of the Google home, asking it about muhammed and jesus... Similar thing used to happen in search, it would have a breaddown of these religious leaders, but for Jesus it didn't.

Anyway, the more you look into Google, you find out it is deeply intertwined with intelligence agencies and political figures, and has many testicles overseas as well. 

Will Google catch the same backlash for censorship as Facebook is catching for data mining?

[SDG 3319]

Short answer: yes.  

[David Dennison 18646]

Why was what's missing put there in the first place?

[TDunk 590]

36 minutes ago, SmokeyBear1861 said:

has many testicles overseas as well.

Freudian slip... 

[Pods 7525]

I'm not sure how that would happen. I'm picturing something like an octopus, but with a scrotum with one ball instead of each leg. Maybe Thujone can help us out. 

[VRHorn 718]

I am angry, but balls and tentacles are confusing to me!

[Biff Tannen 45491]

Is this another persecuted christians thread?

[Hornius Emeritus 12408]

6 hours ago, SmokeyBear1861 said:

 

 While they may be a private company, they still have to follow their own rules and treat their customers fairly.

 

Why?

[sidis 9731]

You said one important thing in your post...that google is highly intertwined with intelligence agencies. That is true and known for most of this decade at this point. Use google at your own risk  

The exemplar you use, of course, is silly and disingenuous. There’s a reason that screen cap cuts everything off after the top...since the very next thing after what you’ve shown is an a version of the pledge that contains all the 1954 updates to the pledge including “under god.” Why are you needlessly censoring the result page to fit your narrative? Do you. Or want people to be informed? Or do you just wish it was not the case that for most of this country’s history, the pledge did not include “under god.”

like ive said many times, if American white Christians ever had to face actual discrimination...say the type they have burdened others with...it would truly be something. 

[6th Street 6354]

[Biff Tannen 45491]

/thread

[Nice Guy Eddie 13406]

His mama named him clay, imma call him clay.

[bad_teammate 13132]

12 hours ago, SmokeyBear1861 said:

I always thought the whole purpose of freedom of speech was to let all sides express their opinions, then let the best arguments win over the hearts and minds of the public. As soon as you begin restricting some, it has the Streisand effect, as well as escalation... 

How the FUCK are the KIDS of AMERICA supposed to know the PLEDGE if (((GOOGLE))) CENSORS our GOD?!!

I mean, they are only forced to recite it every single day in school. lol fuck off

[David Dennison 18646]

Never mind the fact that a pledge of allegiance to a flag is weird and creepy.

[DixonHur 11154]

Why is it Google's fault that whoever edited Wikipedia last mislabeled the original Pledge of Allegiance as the current one?

[Judge Roybeanbag 11802]

He’s only asking questions.  Sheeit.   

[Onboard 2.0 9083]

21 hours ago, SmokeyBear1861 said:

 

Notice anything missing? 

Soon it will be more and more obvious, but Google has been doing the same data mining and censorship shit as facebook, blaming it on their algorithms. It's pretty clear from their one sided censorship at youtube that isn't the case. The algorithm demonetizes, requires age verification, or deletes videos that go against their views. While they may be a private company, they still have to follow their own rules and treat their customers fairly. Pretty interesting as the newer generations are increasingly programmed by these gadgets, they are just getting the one-sided version of reality instead of the whole picture. In my view this causes many to seek out the Truth, and drives them further away from the original message they were trying to push.

I always thought the whole purpose of freedom of speech was to let all sides express their opinions, then let the best arguments win over the hearts and minds of the public. As soon as you begin restricting some, it has the Streisand effect, as well as escalation... 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF7mkyd-Wm4

A video of the Google home, asking it about muhammed and jesus... Similar thing used to happen in search, it would have a breaddown of these religious leaders, but for Jesus it didn't.

Anyway, the more you look into Google, you find out it is deeply intertwined with intelligence agencies and political figures, and has many testicles overseas as well. 

Will Google catch the same backlash for censorship as Facebook is catching for data mining?

The whole saying one nation under God... is pretty much BS and shouldn't be in the pledge... that whole separation of church and state thingy.

[Brian Fantana 6667]

11 hours ago, sidis said:

You said one important thing in your post...that google is highly intertwined with intelligence agencies. That is true and known for most of this decade at this point. Use google at your own risk  

The exemplar you use, of course, is silly and disingenuous. There’s a reason that screen cap cuts everything off after the top...since the very next thing after what you’ve shown is an a version of the pledge that contains all the 1954 updates to the pledge including “under god.” Why are you needlessly censoring the result page to fit your narrative? Do you. Or want people to be informed? Or do you just wish it was not the case that for most of this country’s history, the pledge did not include “under god.”

like ive said many times, if American white Christians ever had to face actual discrimination...say the type they have burdened others with...it would truly be something. 

So wait, you're saying Smokey is full of shit and being dishonest in his presentation of data?

Well, I never.

[Hornius Emeritus 12408]

Are you saying the FBI knows about my fetish for amateur midget lesbian porn?

[DDD Dad 14243]

Clicking on this thread makes me feel stupid for doing so.

 

[thrillhammer 683]

On 4/8/2018 at 7:52 AM, sidis said:

You said one important thing in your post...that google is highly intertwined with intelligence agencies. That is true and known for most of this decade at this point. Use google at your own risk  

The exemplar you use, of course, is silly and disingenuous. There’s a reason that screen cap cuts everything off after the top...since the very next thing after what you’ve shown is an a version of the pledge that contains all the 1954 updates to the pledge including “under god.” Why are you needlessly censoring the result page to fit your narrative? Do you. Or want people to be informed? Or do you just wish it was not the case that for most of this country’s history, the pledge did not include “under god.”

like ive said many times, if American white Christians ever had to face actual discrimination...say the type they have burdened others with...it would truly be something. 

i thought the part about the testicles was pretty important too.

but seriously folks, "use google at your own risk".  dude, get real.  use the internet at your own risk.  use your cell phone at your own risk.  there is no point in demonizing one site over another, not youtube, google, facebook, etc.   it's the nature of the business, and the business that trumps all others is national security.