Donald Trump 2020

[Biff Tannen 45,491]

29 minutes ago, CowboyFred said:

but I thought China would finally pay their fair share?

lol, "approximately 100%"

[BrickHorn 18,186]

4 minutes ago, Chooky said:

The 5 Gallon Bucket O' Taters that you can crap in imarket s peaking. My current rube fleecing scheme is in the idea stage. Right now all I have is ranch style beans poured into condoms. Survival condoms you can use after you finish your peas. I'll hone it down to easier shipping. 

Is it a tactical condom?  Laser sight, accessories rail, etc.?

[Judge Roybeanbag 11,802]

6 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

Is it a tactical condom?  Laser sight, accessories rail, etc.?

5.56 mm  !!

[yoladu 4,066]

15 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

 

he loves trashing American cities. What are his thoughts on Russian cities? Oh, very beautiful? You don't say?

 

Edited January 7, 2020 by yoladu

[jimmyjazz 45,538]

11 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

Is it a tactical condom?  Laser sight, accessories rail, etc.?

Hope it isn't ribbed.  Ranch style beans could get trapped.  Diverticulitis of the prophylactic, if you will.

[yoladu 4,066]

23 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

But first first, the tax cut is going to pay for itself.

i still can't believe we ran a $984 billion deficit in 2019 during the "greatest economy in the history of this country" - and Republicans, of all people, are silent on the matter.

[Biff Tannen 45,491]

14 minutes ago, yoladu said:

he loves trashing American cities. What are his thoughts on Russian cities? Oh, very beautiful? You don't say?

 

I mean seriously, it's just so obvious.  It's just comical at this point. 

[jimmyjazz 45,538]

2 minutes ago, yoladu said:

i still can't believe we ran a $984 billion deficit in 2019 during the "greatest economy in the history of this country" - and Republicans, of all people, are silent on the matter.

I was arguing with a Trumpkin this morning, and pointed out that the deficit and debt are both expanding rapidly under Trump, and that he had promised to eliminate both.

The response?  "He still has 5 years to get it done."

The mind boggles.  So after 3 years of abject waste and net-negative economic policy, they think Trump is still going to keep his campaign promises.  I offered a $100 bet with the money going to a charity of the winner's choice, but no dice.  Funny how that works.

[tx 3 putt 76,296]

1 hour ago, CowboyFred said:

but I thought China would finally pay their fair share?

that’s how you teach China a lesson !!!!!

[Guest Lobo]

Did this obviously very learned Trump supporter also happen to have a working knowledge of how compounding interest affects our debt after three years even if Trump gets it cleaned up in five?

[wildcat09 29,213]

12 minutes ago, yoladu said:

i still can't believe we ran a $984 billion deficit in 2019 during the "greatest economy in the history of this country" - and Republicans, of all people, are silent on the matter.

Did you recently buy some oceanfront property in Arizona?

[jimmyjazz 45,538]

15 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Did this obviously very learned Trump supporter also happen to have a working knowledge of how compounding interest affects our debt after three years even if Trump gets it cleaned up in five?

Well, he is fond of telling me he has a masters degree in economics, so I assume he has the math all worked out.  (I should note that you've surely never heard of the fine institution he attended, but let me just add that they declared bankruptcy in 1989.  After a miraculous turnaround, I'm sure they now rival University of Chicago as a heavyweight school of economics.)

[BrickHorn 18,186]

34 minutes ago, yoladu said:

i still can't believe we ran a $984 billion deficit in 2019 during the "greatest economy in the history of this country" - and Republicans, of all people, are silent on the matter.

Republicans are too busy condemning all the endless wars the... *checks notes* Republicans started.  

Edited January 7, 2020 by BrickHorn

[Biff Tannen 45,491]

33 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I was arguing with a Trumpkin this morning, and pointed out that the deficit and debt are both expanding rapidly under Trump, and that he had promised to eliminate both.

The response?  "He still has 5 years to get it done."

The mind boggles.  So after 3 years of abject waste and net-negative economic policy, they think Trump is still going to keep his campaign promises.  I offered a $100 bet with the money going to a charity of the winner's choice, but no dice.  Funny how that works.

Sounds to me like he knows he was conned, but refuses to admit it.

[Brisketexan 104,537]

2 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Sounds to me like he knows he was conned, but refuses to admit it.

That's exactly it.

"He still has 5 years to get it done" = "Tomorrow's the big day"  Conned people almost always react the same way: instead of acknowledging reality and cutting their losses, avoid embarrassment by insisting that you were right all along, and everyone else is gonna be sorry they ever doubted you. We are being governed by an admin elected by a bunch of April and Billy types.  Now, we just gotta figure out how Louie Anderson figures in.....

[jimmyjazz 45,538]

6 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

Republicans are too busy condemning all the endless wars the... *checks notes* Republicans started.  

A friend of mine posted this rather simplistic (although largely accurate) quip on Facebook:  "Republicans start wars, Democrats end them."

First Trumpkin out of the gate:  "FDR was a Democrat."

 

It was a legitimate coffee-out-the-nose moment for me.  Then another Trumpkin tried to say that in fact, FDR *had* started WW2 when Japan attacked a US Navy vessel on the Yangtze River in 1937.  Uhhh . . . 0-for-2 there, guys.  "Being attacked" is not "starting a war".

 

[SubliminalHorn 6,672]

12 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

A friend of mine posted this rather simplistic (although largely accurate) quip on Facebook:  "Republicans start wars, Democrats end them."

First Trumpkin out of the gate:  "FDR was a Democrat."

 

It was a legitimate coffee-out-the-nose moment for me.  Then another Trumpkin tried to say that in fact, FDR *had* started WW2 when Japan attacked a US Navy vessel on the Yangtze River in 1937.  Uhhh . . . 0-for-2 there, guys.  "Being attacked" is not "starting a war".

 

I’ve almost completely cleaned my fb of trumpkin morons. A couple are still around, but they post very little and I’m not that active on it anyway

[Chooky 13,296]

2 hours ago, BrickHorn said:

Is it a tactical condom?  Laser sight, accessories rail, etc.?

Just a USB port right now but development is evolving every hour.

[Pasken 1,309]

1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

"Being attacked" is not "starting a war".

 

It's not that simple.  The US was waging an economic war on Japan before Pearl Harbor by cutting them off from a number of resources including Oil so I don't really think it's as simple to say that nothing FDR did led to Pearl Habor.  However, I also don't think that means he made a mistake in not wanting to support the Empire's war machine which was committing a number of war crimes. 

[Chad Fuck 17,548]

2 hours ago, yoladu said:

he loves trashing American cities. What are his thoughts on Russian cities? Oh, very beautiful? You don't say?

 

Narrator:  Those terrorists?  Actually American agents.

[Guest Lobo]

1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

A friend of mine posted this rather simplistic (although largely accurate) quip on Facebook:  "Republicans start wars, Democrats end them."

First Trumpkin out of the gate:  "FDR was a Democrat."

 

It was a legitimate coffee-out-the-nose moment for me.  Then another Trumpkin tried to say that in fact, FDR *had* started WW2 when Japan attacked a US Navy vessel on the Yangtze River in 1937.  Uhhh . . . 0-for-2 there, guys.  "Being attacked" is not "starting a war".

 

Your friend is an idiot.  But he does beg the question—-why did the US attack The Reich?   I don’t recall them attacking our shores.  

[Chad Fuck 17,548]

1 hour ago, SubliminalHorn said:

I’ve almost completely cleaned my fb of trumpkin morons. A couple are still around, but they post very little and I’m not that active on it anyway

Mine has self-cleansed.  The majority of the Trumpkins no longer post anything political.  We'll see if it ramps up during election season.  They're back to posting pics of their dogs and what their kids are up to.  

I like keeping them around just to see what's going on in their heads.  The last week or so has included a lot of "Dems hate 'Murca cause they love Iranian generals!!" and other such genuine frontier gibberish.

 

[jimmyjazz 45,538]

10 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Your friend is an idiot.  

I don't know the person who posted that, and they definitely aren't "my friend".

 

Quote

But he does beg the question—-why did the US attack The Reich?  

Because Germany declared war on the United States?

[Tuco 5,076]

(deleted for being too slow) 

 

Edited January 7, 2020 by Tuco

[Judge Roybeanbag 11,802]

7 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I don't know the person who posted that, and they definitely aren't "my friend".

 

Because Germany declared war on the United States?

I always wondered, what are your options there?  Could we politely decline to declare war back?  

[jimmyjazz 45,538]

2 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

I always wondered, what are your options there?  Could we politely decline to declare war back?  

I guess it depends on whether the initial declaration had an RSVP.

[SaucyJack 3,487]

2 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

Did you recently buy some oceanfront property in Arizona?

Hits close to home as I find myself in Amarillo, up from San Antone. 

[NWBuck 8,547]

28 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Your friend is an idiot.  But he does beg the question—-why did the US attack The Reich?   I don’t recall them attacking our shores.  

Well, Hawaii isn't contiguous, but I think that the Germans bombing Pearl Harbor probably deserved a response. We certainly didn't think it was over.

Edited January 7, 2020 by NWBuck

[atomheartbevo 89,396]

55 minutes ago, Chooky said:

Just a USB port right now but development is evolving every hour.

What about HDMI?  And will there be coupons?

[atomheartbevo 89,396]

30 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

Mine has self-cleansed.  The majority of the Trumpkins no longer post anything political.  We'll see if it ramps up during election season.  They're back to posting pics of their dogs and what their kids are up to.  

I like keeping them around just to see what's going on in their heads.  The last week or so has included a lot of "Dems hate 'Murca cause they love Iranian generals!!" and other such genuine frontier gibberish.

Mine that were reaching Linda Graham levels of fellating Trump are strangely silent these days.   Maybe they aren’t compromised.   

[Judge Roybeanbag 11,802]

8 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Mine that were reaching Linda Graham levels of fellating Trump are strangely silent these days.   Maybe they aren’t compromised.   

More likely they got a windows update over the holidays and haven't figured out how to get back online yet.

[Fudge Nuggets 19,144]

47 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Your friend is an idiot.  But he does beg the question—-why did the US attack The Reich?   I don’t recall them attacking our shores.  

[Guest Lobo]

Yes, they did attack our embassy though!

[Burt 4,062]

2 hours ago, SubliminalHorn said:

I’ve almost completely cleaned my fb of trumpkin morons. A couple are still around, but they post very little and I’m not that active on it anyway

If I did that it'd just be my wife and I posting back and forth to each other.

[TwiceHorn 31,240]

On 1/5/2020 at 8:51 PM, atomheartbevo said:

October 6, 1980.  He wanted us to attack Iran then.

Why were people interviewing that shitpickle (h/t Bama Chick) in 1980?  JFC.

Of course, it was Rona Barrett on some precursor to Entertainment Tonight.

Edited January 7, 2020 by TwiceHorn

[4th&Five 41,457]

Because he was always available to be a clown and say dumb shit in front of a camera. Not much has changed but he found a way to get racists and morons to fall in love with him by attacking the first black president. 

[Brandywine 1,312]

9 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Why were people interviewing that shitpickle (h/t Bama Chick) in 1980?  JFC.

Of course, it was Rona Barrett on some precursor to Entertainment Tonight.

Trump was all big balls and saying that the US should have gone in and blah, blah, blah. But that asshole would be the last one to fight and wouldn’t give a shit how many died. Just as long as he made his money. And his kids are just exactly like him. 

Edited January 7, 2020 by Brandywine

[Chooky 13,296]

Richard Painter is a blast.

 

[Biff Tannen 45,491]

1 minute ago, Chooky said:

Richard Painter is a blast.

 

I miss him going on CNN and calling the president an abject moron.

[workswithseed 2,033]

1 hour ago, Lobo said:

Your friend is an idiot.  But he does beg the question—-why did the US attack The Reich?   I don’t recall them attacking our shores.  

The declared war on us, hoping the we would be busy with Japan.

[ConferenceRoom 6,123]

12 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

The declared war on us, hoping the we would be busy with Japan.

They declared war on us because they had to. 

[Fudge Nuggets 19,144]

9 minutes ago, ConferenceRoom said:

They declared war on us because they had to. 

Because Hitler was always known to keep his word?  Stalin would like to have a word with you - well, he's dead but you get the point.

[ConferenceRoom 6,123]

2 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Because Hitler was always known to keep his word?  Stalin would like to have a word with you - well, he's dead but you get the point.

Yeah, actually they weren't compelled if Japan attacked a third country; only if Japan were attacked by a third party. As it turned out, Hitler had his bad idea jeans on that day. 

[Gatorubet 30,083]

Because Germany declared war on the United States?

But was the letter signed? It may have been a draft.

[SubliminalHorn 6,672]

7 minutes ago, ConferenceRoom said:

Yeah, actually they weren't compelled if Japan attacked a third country; only if Japan were attacked by a third party. As it turned out, Hitler had his bad idea jeans on that day. 

He had them on often, his fuckups doomed them when they clearly had the upper hand in several situations 

[ConferenceRoom 6,123]

Just now, SubliminalHorn said:

He had them on often, his fuckups doomed them when they clearly had the upper hand in several situations 

The micromanaging in Russia was pretty staggering. 

[Irwin F Fletcher 3,550]

That riffle looks like a toy, I hope Don Jr. doesn't shoot his eye out. 

[workswithseed 2,033]

1 minute ago, ConferenceRoom said:

The micromanaging in Russia was pretty staggering. 

He had a chance to kill lots of French and British troops if he didn't stop his attack.

Also the battle of Britain, and countless other missteps.

1 minute ago, ConferenceRoom said:

The micromanaging in Russia was pretty staggering

How did this quote twice?.

[Biff Tannen 45,491]

Start a WW2 thread or something.  This is for dotard.

[Mo Horn 8,807]

Sleep well America, we're in good hands.